Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Institute for National Security Studies-Tel Aviv University) Emily B. Landau and Ephraim Asculai - In March 2012, President Obama affirmed unequivocally that his policy regarding Iran's nuclear advances was a policy of prevention, not containment. Since his visit to Israel in March of this year, another round of negotiations between the P5+1 and Iran has failed, and the latest IAEA report on Iran - released May 22, 2013 - indicates that Iran's uranium enrichment and plutonium programs are creeping slowly but surely toward a situation that will soon be unstoppable. It is blatantly apparent that the "diplomatic" route for solving the Iran conundrum has failed, even though the U.S. administration has yet to admit this. In considering the next stage, can the U.S. indeed depend on the fact that it will obtain reliable information that an Iranian decision to develop nuclear weapons has been taken? If it does, will it be at a stage when there is still a realistic option of employing military force in a manner that will reverse the current trajectory toward a military nuclear capability? And most importantly, will the U.S. ultimately be willing to employ force in dealing with Iran? The writers are senior research fellows at INSS. 2013-05-27 00:00:00Full Article
Is the U.S. Receding to a Containment Policy on Iran?
(Institute for National Security Studies-Tel Aviv University) Emily B. Landau and Ephraim Asculai - In March 2012, President Obama affirmed unequivocally that his policy regarding Iran's nuclear advances was a policy of prevention, not containment. Since his visit to Israel in March of this year, another round of negotiations between the P5+1 and Iran has failed, and the latest IAEA report on Iran - released May 22, 2013 - indicates that Iran's uranium enrichment and plutonium programs are creeping slowly but surely toward a situation that will soon be unstoppable. It is blatantly apparent that the "diplomatic" route for solving the Iran conundrum has failed, even though the U.S. administration has yet to admit this. In considering the next stage, can the U.S. indeed depend on the fact that it will obtain reliable information that an Iranian decision to develop nuclear weapons has been taken? If it does, will it be at a stage when there is still a realistic option of employing military force in a manner that will reverse the current trajectory toward a military nuclear capability? And most importantly, will the U.S. ultimately be willing to employ force in dealing with Iran? The writers are senior research fellows at INSS. 2013-05-27 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|