Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Commentary) Evelyn Gordon - In a study recently published by the Rand Corporation, author Alireza Nader concludes that containing a nuclear Iran is feasible because Iran's nukes wouldn't threaten either America or its Middle Eastern allies. "Iran does not have territorial ambitions and does not seek to invade, conquer, or occupy other nations," Nader asserted. That might have been a tenable theory 25 years ago, when Iran was still licking its wounds from an eight-year war with Iraq. Since then, however, Iran has effectively taken over Lebanon and is now seeking to do the same with Syria. The takeover of Lebanon was completed in 2008, when Iran's wholly-owned Lebanese subsidiary, Hizbullah, staged an armed occupation of Beirut to reverse government decisions, forcing the government to sign a power-sharing deal that effectively gave Hizbullah a veto over all government decisions. Now, Iran is trying to annex Syria. It's clear that if Assad survives, Syria will be another wholly-owned Iranian subsidiary. As one senior Iranian cleric helpfully explained in February, "Syria is the 35th province [of Iran] and a strategic province for us....If we lose Syria, we cannot keep Tehran." 2013-05-31 00:00:00Full Article
Iran Has No Territorial Ambitions? Tell It to Lebanon and Syria
(Commentary) Evelyn Gordon - In a study recently published by the Rand Corporation, author Alireza Nader concludes that containing a nuclear Iran is feasible because Iran's nukes wouldn't threaten either America or its Middle Eastern allies. "Iran does not have territorial ambitions and does not seek to invade, conquer, or occupy other nations," Nader asserted. That might have been a tenable theory 25 years ago, when Iran was still licking its wounds from an eight-year war with Iraq. Since then, however, Iran has effectively taken over Lebanon and is now seeking to do the same with Syria. The takeover of Lebanon was completed in 2008, when Iran's wholly-owned Lebanese subsidiary, Hizbullah, staged an armed occupation of Beirut to reverse government decisions, forcing the government to sign a power-sharing deal that effectively gave Hizbullah a veto over all government decisions. Now, Iran is trying to annex Syria. It's clear that if Assad survives, Syria will be another wholly-owned Iranian subsidiary. As one senior Iranian cleric helpfully explained in February, "Syria is the 35th province [of Iran] and a strategic province for us....If we lose Syria, we cannot keep Tehran." 2013-05-31 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|