Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Strategic Assessment-INSS-Tel Aviv University) Ephraim Asculai - Labeling the Bushehr reactor as a main target for a strike is pure demagoguery, as no one in his right mind would consider striking an operating nuclear power reactor. First, the environmental consequences could be horrendous. Second, the utilization of this reactor for military purposes is not straightforward, while the subsequent stages for fissile materials production are also vulnerable and carry less potential for environmental consequences. Third, Iran is contractually obligated to return the irradiated fuel to Russia, so why attack this installation? The more important possible targets of a military attack are the uranium enrichment facilities at Natanz and Fordow. At normal room temperature uranium hexafluoride (UF6) is a solid. Under normal conditions, if the container is ruptured, very small quantities of gas will escape to the environment and can cause injuries or even death to the workers at hand, but not to anyone beyond an immediate, circumscribed distance from the source. Since the UF6 is stored underground, even if there is a direct hit on a container, it is doubtful that a significant part of its inventory would leak to the outside atmosphere. The writer is a senior research fellow at the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS). 2013-06-05 00:00:00Full Article
Civilian Casualties of a Military Strike in Iran
(Strategic Assessment-INSS-Tel Aviv University) Ephraim Asculai - Labeling the Bushehr reactor as a main target for a strike is pure demagoguery, as no one in his right mind would consider striking an operating nuclear power reactor. First, the environmental consequences could be horrendous. Second, the utilization of this reactor for military purposes is not straightforward, while the subsequent stages for fissile materials production are also vulnerable and carry less potential for environmental consequences. Third, Iran is contractually obligated to return the irradiated fuel to Russia, so why attack this installation? The more important possible targets of a military attack are the uranium enrichment facilities at Natanz and Fordow. At normal room temperature uranium hexafluoride (UF6) is a solid. Under normal conditions, if the container is ruptured, very small quantities of gas will escape to the environment and can cause injuries or even death to the workers at hand, but not to anyone beyond an immediate, circumscribed distance from the source. Since the UF6 is stored underground, even if there is a direct hit on a container, it is doubtful that a significant part of its inventory would leak to the outside atmosphere. The writer is a senior research fellow at the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS). 2013-06-05 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|