Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Chicago Tribune) - The U.S. does not object in principle to "targeted killings," and Washington does not differentiate between military and political leaders of Hamas. The Americans merely urge Israel to do what it can to avoid civilian casualties. In a paper in a military journal, Maj. Gen. Amos Yadlin, chief of the Military Colleges, and Israeli philosophy professor Asa Kasher write, "Any political stand that does not identify with our obligation to defend the lives of our civilians from the danger of terrorism is not moral." The article says the army goes to great lengths to obtain good intelligence and to avoid hurting "human surroundings." The military insists that taking out the planners can stop an attack before it is launched. Removing the fundraisers and ideological guides from a group such as Hamas can cripple its operations. Keeping the leaders on the run makes it hard for them to get anything done. Army Maj. Sharon Feingold used the analogy of mowing the lawn. Keep at it every week and you keep it under control; let it go and it will overrun you. "We see that when you apply pressure to these guys it makes them cringe," Feingold said. "We have to make it clear that no one is immune."2003-09-15 00:00:00Full Article
Israel Vows No Quarter for Hamas
(Chicago Tribune) - The U.S. does not object in principle to "targeted killings," and Washington does not differentiate between military and political leaders of Hamas. The Americans merely urge Israel to do what it can to avoid civilian casualties. In a paper in a military journal, Maj. Gen. Amos Yadlin, chief of the Military Colleges, and Israeli philosophy professor Asa Kasher write, "Any political stand that does not identify with our obligation to defend the lives of our civilians from the danger of terrorism is not moral." The article says the army goes to great lengths to obtain good intelligence and to avoid hurting "human surroundings." The military insists that taking out the planners can stop an attack before it is launched. Removing the fundraisers and ideological guides from a group such as Hamas can cripple its operations. Keeping the leaders on the run makes it hard for them to get anything done. Army Maj. Sharon Feingold used the analogy of mowing the lawn. Keep at it every week and you keep it under control; let it go and it will overrun you. "We see that when you apply pressure to these guys it makes them cringe," Feingold said. "We have to make it clear that no one is immune."2003-09-15 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|