Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Times) Abraham H. Foxman - Israel will continue to build the fence to protect its citizens. It has no other choice. Images abound of the U.S. putting fences and walls in the Southwest to prevent the illegal entry of Central Americans. But it is suicide bombers that Israel has to contend with, not illegal immigrants. If Israel were forced to build the fence along the 1967 borders, the clear message would be that the Palestinians had succeeded in forcing Israel out of the territories without ending the conflict. Any future negotiation will invariably begin with the view that Israel had already conceded the entire West Bank. The notion that building the fence forecloses future negotiations is bogus. Whatever fence Israel is building could and would come down if the Palestinians were to dismantle the terrorist infrastructure and negotiate peace in good faith. The writer is National Director of the Anti-Defamation League. 2003-10-17 00:00:00Full Article
Building a Fence against Terror
(Washington Times) Abraham H. Foxman - Israel will continue to build the fence to protect its citizens. It has no other choice. Images abound of the U.S. putting fences and walls in the Southwest to prevent the illegal entry of Central Americans. But it is suicide bombers that Israel has to contend with, not illegal immigrants. If Israel were forced to build the fence along the 1967 borders, the clear message would be that the Palestinians had succeeded in forcing Israel out of the territories without ending the conflict. Any future negotiation will invariably begin with the view that Israel had already conceded the entire West Bank. The notion that building the fence forecloses future negotiations is bogus. Whatever fence Israel is building could and would come down if the Palestinians were to dismantle the terrorist infrastructure and negotiate peace in good faith. The writer is National Director of the Anti-Defamation League. 2003-10-17 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|