Home
Archives
Jerusalem Center Homepage
View the current issue
Jerusalem Center Videos
Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Ha'aretz) James Kirchick - Last Wednesday, the government of Austria began withdrawing its 377 soldiers serving in the Golan Heights as part of the UN Disengagement Observer Force, or UNDOF, which has policed the disputed boundary between Syria and Israel since 1974. In response, UN Secretary-General Ban-Ki Moon has been panhandling the international community for handouts in the form of replacement forces. One might ask what is the purpose of a "peacekeeping" mission that flees the scene at the slightest indication of peacebreaking. It is not UNDOF that has kept the Golan quiet for most of the past four decades. The maintenance of peace and security is due almost entirely to Israel's unquestioned military supremacy. When Israel is strong and the Arab states fear its awesome power, they either sign peace treaties (Egypt and Jordan) or limit their hostility to bombast and support for subnational terrorist organizations (Syria). The UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) was established in 1978. Its latest mandate, UN Security Council Resolution 1701, calls for the disarmament of all militias. In the years since the 2006 Hizbullah-Israel war, the Shi'ite terrorist group has drastically increased its armed presence in southern Lebanon, all under the eye of the UN, which is obligated to stop such transgressions. Yet, as former Israeli UN Ambassador Dore Gold told me, "The chances of UNIFIL doing that are like the chances of snow falling in the Sinai in summertime." Whether it was in the Sinai in 1967, Lebanon in 2006, or the Golan today, the international community has repeatedly backed down in the face of belligerence. This record has implications for any future peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians, bolstering the Israeli demand for an IDF presence in the Jordan Valley. Why should Israel be expected to hang its future security on the empty promises of those who have failed it so many times in the past. The writer is a fellow with the Foreign Policy Initiative. 2013-06-20 00:00:00Full Article
Fiasco on the Golan: UN Lays Bare Its Peacekeeping Irrelevance for Israel
(Ha'aretz) James Kirchick - Last Wednesday, the government of Austria began withdrawing its 377 soldiers serving in the Golan Heights as part of the UN Disengagement Observer Force, or UNDOF, which has policed the disputed boundary between Syria and Israel since 1974. In response, UN Secretary-General Ban-Ki Moon has been panhandling the international community for handouts in the form of replacement forces. One might ask what is the purpose of a "peacekeeping" mission that flees the scene at the slightest indication of peacebreaking. It is not UNDOF that has kept the Golan quiet for most of the past four decades. The maintenance of peace and security is due almost entirely to Israel's unquestioned military supremacy. When Israel is strong and the Arab states fear its awesome power, they either sign peace treaties (Egypt and Jordan) or limit their hostility to bombast and support for subnational terrorist organizations (Syria). The UN Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) was established in 1978. Its latest mandate, UN Security Council Resolution 1701, calls for the disarmament of all militias. In the years since the 2006 Hizbullah-Israel war, the Shi'ite terrorist group has drastically increased its armed presence in southern Lebanon, all under the eye of the UN, which is obligated to stop such transgressions. Yet, as former Israeli UN Ambassador Dore Gold told me, "The chances of UNIFIL doing that are like the chances of snow falling in the Sinai in summertime." Whether it was in the Sinai in 1967, Lebanon in 2006, or the Golan today, the international community has repeatedly backed down in the face of belligerence. This record has implications for any future peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians, bolstering the Israeli demand for an IDF presence in the Jordan Valley. Why should Israel be expected to hang its future security on the empty promises of those who have failed it so many times in the past. The writer is a fellow with the Foreign Policy Initiative. 2013-06-20 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
|
Search:
|