Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(U.S. News) - Mortimer B. Zuckerman Washington has looked to the IAEA to condemn Iran and trigger a UN Security Council resolution of condemnation and sanctions. To circumvent this, Iran did its deal with the foreign ministers of Britain, France, and Germany, whereby it signed up for a tougher inspection program and agreed to "suspend" the enrichment of uranium. Yet the agreement is full of holes, imposing no schedules or deadlines, as the chief of Iran's national security council glibly admitted. To test this new agreement, first, Iran must hand over to the UN's nuclear watchdog agency a complete, nondoctored account of all of its nuclear activities over the past several years. Second, it must adhere to a tight schedule on the promises it has made in the accord. Third, it must be held to a precise definition of every obligation it has undertaken. Last, inspection and monitoring must be unconditional and implemented quickly. If these steps are not taken, America will face the same situation in Iran we face now with North Korea. It agreed to suspend all its nuclear activities, then promptly began concealing its work building bombs. It's bad enough to make a big mistake once. We don't have to follow it with an encore. 2003-11-10 00:00:00Full Article
Holding Iran's Feet to the Fire
(U.S. News) - Mortimer B. Zuckerman Washington has looked to the IAEA to condemn Iran and trigger a UN Security Council resolution of condemnation and sanctions. To circumvent this, Iran did its deal with the foreign ministers of Britain, France, and Germany, whereby it signed up for a tougher inspection program and agreed to "suspend" the enrichment of uranium. Yet the agreement is full of holes, imposing no schedules or deadlines, as the chief of Iran's national security council glibly admitted. To test this new agreement, first, Iran must hand over to the UN's nuclear watchdog agency a complete, nondoctored account of all of its nuclear activities over the past several years. Second, it must adhere to a tight schedule on the promises it has made in the accord. Third, it must be held to a precise definition of every obligation it has undertaken. Last, inspection and monitoring must be unconditional and implemented quickly. If these steps are not taken, America will face the same situation in Iran we face now with North Korea. It agreed to suspend all its nuclear activities, then promptly began concealing its work building bombs. It's bad enough to make a big mistake once. We don't have to follow it with an encore. 2003-11-10 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|