Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Institute for Near East Policy) Michael Eisenstadt - Washington must supplement sanctions with the more effective use of its military, and of the informational and soft-power assets that Tehran really fears, to alter the Islamic Republic's cost-benefit calculus. Washington has frequently responded with an abundance of prudence and caution to Iranian actions. Such restraint, however, is seen in Tehran as a sign of weakness, and may cause Tehran to doubt U.S. claims that "all options are on the table" regarding its nuclear program. Washington must convince Tehran that it risks a military confrontation with the U.S. if it continues toward becoming a nuclear threshold state. Tehran should also understand that in the event of a military confrontation, the U.S. will not respond in a symmetric manner, but with measures that could potentially destabilize the Islamic Republic. The writer is a senior fellow and director of The Washington Institute's Military and Security Studies Program. 2013-07-02 00:00:00Full Article
Not by Sanctions Alone: Using Military and Other Means to Bolster Nuclear Diplomacy with Iran
(Washington Institute for Near East Policy) Michael Eisenstadt - Washington must supplement sanctions with the more effective use of its military, and of the informational and soft-power assets that Tehran really fears, to alter the Islamic Republic's cost-benefit calculus. Washington has frequently responded with an abundance of prudence and caution to Iranian actions. Such restraint, however, is seen in Tehran as a sign of weakness, and may cause Tehran to doubt U.S. claims that "all options are on the table" regarding its nuclear program. Washington must convince Tehran that it risks a military confrontation with the U.S. if it continues toward becoming a nuclear threshold state. Tehran should also understand that in the event of a military confrontation, the U.S. will not respond in a symmetric manner, but with measures that could potentially destabilize the Islamic Republic. The writer is a senior fellow and director of The Washington Institute's Military and Security Studies Program. 2013-07-02 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|