Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Jerusalem Post) Barry Rubin - • Two disproved propositions underlying the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are: 1) Israel must keep offering the Palestinians more until they accept a deal. 2) If Israel keeps offering more concessions it will win international support and sympathy. • Unfortunately, Arafat is not a nationalist whose appetite would be assuaged by the creation of a state. He is basically a combination of old-fashioned Islamist, who believes that God is on his side and that compromise is sinful, and romantic revolutionary, who does not want the battle to end. •What has instead happened is that the Palestinian appetite grows with the feeding. The more Israel offers, the more Palestinians demand. Experience has taught the Palestinian leadership that as it refuses compromise, Israelis who claim to speak for Israel offer more concessions. • In the West, moderation and generosity are taken as proofs that one truly wants to settle a dispute; in the Middle East they are taken as signs of weakness and of knowing that one's cause is unjust. •The central problem is a Palestinian refusal to settle for anything but everything, either immediately or in stages. The Palestinian leadership and opinion-makers are not people whom Israel will persuade by concessions. •By continuing to insist that the problem is that Israel has not offered enough, Israelis do not prove their goodwill but rather seem to suggest that they are the guilty party. This is also part of the reason for the world's hostility. 2003-12-11 00:00:00Full Article
Concessions Don't Help
(Jerusalem Post) Barry Rubin - • Two disproved propositions underlying the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are: 1) Israel must keep offering the Palestinians more until they accept a deal. 2) If Israel keeps offering more concessions it will win international support and sympathy. • Unfortunately, Arafat is not a nationalist whose appetite would be assuaged by the creation of a state. He is basically a combination of old-fashioned Islamist, who believes that God is on his side and that compromise is sinful, and romantic revolutionary, who does not want the battle to end. •What has instead happened is that the Palestinian appetite grows with the feeding. The more Israel offers, the more Palestinians demand. Experience has taught the Palestinian leadership that as it refuses compromise, Israelis who claim to speak for Israel offer more concessions. • In the West, moderation and generosity are taken as proofs that one truly wants to settle a dispute; in the Middle East they are taken as signs of weakness and of knowing that one's cause is unjust. •The central problem is a Palestinian refusal to settle for anything but everything, either immediately or in stages. The Palestinian leadership and opinion-makers are not people whom Israel will persuade by concessions. •By continuing to insist that the problem is that Israel has not offered enough, Israelis do not prove their goodwill but rather seem to suggest that they are the guilty party. This is also part of the reason for the world's hostility. 2003-12-11 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|