Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(USA Today) Dennis Ross - The term "Arab Spring" was always a misnomer. There was never going to be a rapid transformation from authoritarian rule to democracy in Middle Eastern countries. Genuine democracy requires not just elections; it requires a political culture of tolerance and respect for minority rights; institutions that provide for the rule of law; a readiness to accept the outcome of elections even when you lose; and a recognition that governance cannot favor only one group to the exclusion of everyone else. However, there was an "awakening" in many of the countries of the Middle East in 2011. Suddenly people saw themselves as citizens and not as subjects: as citizens they had a right to make demands, have a voice, expectations and hopes - and above all else, create accountability. In Egypt, President Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood acted in power as if they were the new authoritarians. Yes, he was elected; however, he was not anointed, and he and his colleagues acted as if they had been. Rather than be inclusive, Morsi appointed mostly members of the Muslim Brotherhood and sought to rule by decree, ensure that the new constitution would be written only by Islamists, prosecute journalists that "insulted" the president, remove judges who opposed him, and ignore the economic needs of the country. This is not like Algeria where the military acted to void an election and prevent a newly voted in Islamist leadership from assuming power. This was the Egyptian public literally revolting and seeking a course correction. Any future leadership, including one that may involve the Muslim Brotherhood, must start with the premise of sharing power and responsibility. The writer, a special assistant to President Obama and senior director of the Central Region on the National Security Council from 2009 to 2011, is now a counselor at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 2013-07-09 00:00:00Full Article
Democracy in Egypt Needs More than an Election
(USA Today) Dennis Ross - The term "Arab Spring" was always a misnomer. There was never going to be a rapid transformation from authoritarian rule to democracy in Middle Eastern countries. Genuine democracy requires not just elections; it requires a political culture of tolerance and respect for minority rights; institutions that provide for the rule of law; a readiness to accept the outcome of elections even when you lose; and a recognition that governance cannot favor only one group to the exclusion of everyone else. However, there was an "awakening" in many of the countries of the Middle East in 2011. Suddenly people saw themselves as citizens and not as subjects: as citizens they had a right to make demands, have a voice, expectations and hopes - and above all else, create accountability. In Egypt, President Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood acted in power as if they were the new authoritarians. Yes, he was elected; however, he was not anointed, and he and his colleagues acted as if they had been. Rather than be inclusive, Morsi appointed mostly members of the Muslim Brotherhood and sought to rule by decree, ensure that the new constitution would be written only by Islamists, prosecute journalists that "insulted" the president, remove judges who opposed him, and ignore the economic needs of the country. This is not like Algeria where the military acted to void an election and prevent a newly voted in Islamist leadership from assuming power. This was the Egyptian public literally revolting and seeking a course correction. Any future leadership, including one that may involve the Muslim Brotherhood, must start with the premise of sharing power and responsibility. The writer, a special assistant to President Obama and senior director of the Central Region on the National Security Council from 2009 to 2011, is now a counselor at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 2013-07-09 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|