Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
Shlomo Avineri - There is no doubt that the Palestinian Authority in its present form cannot be a partner for peace negotiations. But in the quest for alternatives, some dangerous nonsense is being touted as new conventional wisdom. The most outlandish is the possibility of the PA becoming democratic and transparent. While the last two decades have witnessed momentous movements for reform and democratization, there is no such parallel in Arab countries. There has been no Arab Gorbachev, Arab Solidarity, or Charter-77 movement. Neither from the top down, nor from the bottom up, has Arab society shown a capacity for democratization or reform. The success of democratization depends on the existence of numerous social conditions: mediating institutions, a civil society, social tolerance, and pluralism. No such conditions exist today in any Arab country; none exists in Palestinian society, which has been mobilized by a terroristic nationalism for decades. To imagine, therefore, that the PA can be democratized with or without Arafat is a pipe dream. (The author was Director-General of Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs during the first government of Yitzhak Rabin. From the Jerusalem Post.)2002-05-28 00:00:00Full Article
Dangerous Illusions: Reform of the Palestinian Authority
Shlomo Avineri - There is no doubt that the Palestinian Authority in its present form cannot be a partner for peace negotiations. But in the quest for alternatives, some dangerous nonsense is being touted as new conventional wisdom. The most outlandish is the possibility of the PA becoming democratic and transparent. While the last two decades have witnessed momentous movements for reform and democratization, there is no such parallel in Arab countries. There has been no Arab Gorbachev, Arab Solidarity, or Charter-77 movement. Neither from the top down, nor from the bottom up, has Arab society shown a capacity for democratization or reform. The success of democratization depends on the existence of numerous social conditions: mediating institutions, a civil society, social tolerance, and pluralism. No such conditions exist today in any Arab country; none exists in Palestinian society, which has been mobilized by a terroristic nationalism for decades. To imagine, therefore, that the PA can be democratized with or without Arafat is a pipe dream. (The author was Director-General of Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs during the first government of Yitzhak Rabin. From the Jerusalem Post.)2002-05-28 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|