Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Times) Zalman Shoval - President Bush's proposed three-year timeline leading to Palestinian statehood is a target date that will remain hypothetical unless the preconditions clearly set out in his speech are met. In other words, the clock isn't ticking yet, and the countdown to Palestinian statehood isn't about to start until there is an absolute end to terror and violence, the dismantling of the terrorist infrastructure, and a new and changed Palestinian leadership. Though Mr. Bush's vision is one of a "democratic, stable, peaceful, viable and credible" Palestinian state living in peace alongside Israel - like Canada bordering on the United States - there is always the possibility, some would say the probability, that a future Palestinian state, right there in Israel's backyard, would turn out to be another brutal, corrupt, undemocratic rogue state - like so many others in the Arab Middle East. No less problematic is the term "viable" as applied to a future Palestinian state. Palestinian society has never been able to constitute well-functioning institutions of any sort - not under the British mandate and not after "Oslo." This is contrary to the Zionist movement which, under far worse initial conditions, successfully created a virtual "state-within-a-state" long before achieving independence in 1948. Perhaps this is so because, until quite recently, most Arabs living in the country quite simply didn't see themselves as a people apart. Or maybe, as the recent U.N.-sponsored "Arab Human Development Report" makes clear, not even the existing Arab states, whether Islamist or secular, have been able to become part of the modern world.2002-08-06 00:00:00Full Article
Is Palestinian Statehood Inevitable?
(Washington Times) Zalman Shoval - President Bush's proposed three-year timeline leading to Palestinian statehood is a target date that will remain hypothetical unless the preconditions clearly set out in his speech are met. In other words, the clock isn't ticking yet, and the countdown to Palestinian statehood isn't about to start until there is an absolute end to terror and violence, the dismantling of the terrorist infrastructure, and a new and changed Palestinian leadership. Though Mr. Bush's vision is one of a "democratic, stable, peaceful, viable and credible" Palestinian state living in peace alongside Israel - like Canada bordering on the United States - there is always the possibility, some would say the probability, that a future Palestinian state, right there in Israel's backyard, would turn out to be another brutal, corrupt, undemocratic rogue state - like so many others in the Arab Middle East. No less problematic is the term "viable" as applied to a future Palestinian state. Palestinian society has never been able to constitute well-functioning institutions of any sort - not under the British mandate and not after "Oslo." This is contrary to the Zionist movement which, under far worse initial conditions, successfully created a virtual "state-within-a-state" long before achieving independence in 1948. Perhaps this is so because, until quite recently, most Arabs living in the country quite simply didn't see themselves as a people apart. Or maybe, as the recent U.N.-sponsored "Arab Human Development Report" makes clear, not even the existing Arab states, whether Islamist or secular, have been able to become part of the modern world.2002-08-06 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|