Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Seattle Times) Michael Kelly - The emerging core argument against war with Iraq is that such a war would constitute an unprovoked attack against a sovereign state. After Sept. 11, the largely accepted argument became: Persistent state support for groups bent on waging war against the U.S. is sufficient provocation for a U.S. attack against that state, and we, rightly, attacked the sovereign state of Afghanistan. The fact of Iraq's persistence in its weapons program is alone "proper provocation," as it clearly and massively violates the 1991 cease-fire that Iraq signed to escape destruction in the Gulf War. The United States has frequently waged war on nations that have not "properly" provoked it. Such conflicts include the invasions of Grenada and Panama, the Gulf War, and the air campaigns in 1996 against the Serbs in Bosnia and in 1999 against Serbia itself over Kosovo. 2002-08-15 00:00:00Full Article
History and Logic Dictate War with Iraq
(Seattle Times) Michael Kelly - The emerging core argument against war with Iraq is that such a war would constitute an unprovoked attack against a sovereign state. After Sept. 11, the largely accepted argument became: Persistent state support for groups bent on waging war against the U.S. is sufficient provocation for a U.S. attack against that state, and we, rightly, attacked the sovereign state of Afghanistan. The fact of Iraq's persistence in its weapons program is alone "proper provocation," as it clearly and massively violates the 1991 cease-fire that Iraq signed to escape destruction in the Gulf War. The United States has frequently waged war on nations that have not "properly" provoked it. Such conflicts include the invasions of Grenada and Panama, the Gulf War, and the air campaigns in 1996 against the Serbs in Bosnia and in 1999 against Serbia itself over Kosovo. 2002-08-15 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|