Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Israel Hayom) Dore Gold - Assad's decision to use chemical weapons last week was because, to a large extent, he is already feeling that his back is against the wall. After all, he used his chemical arsenal against a rebel stronghold not in some remote region but right outside of Damascus, which could have become the springboard for a final offensive against the regime. The fact that Assad and his Iranian allies have not been able to win the war, despite all the outside assistance they have received to date, indicates that Assad's situation must be much worse than it seems on the outside. If Assad is indeed weaker than anyone thought and his chemical attack was more an act of desperation rather than a statement of self-confidence, then U.S. military action could potentially accelerate the end of his regime. While Iran pours Shiite militias into Syria, rival Sunni jihadist forces have built up their military capacity, as well. In the years ahead, Syria could well become a far more dangerous sanctuary for jihadist organizations than Afghanistan ever was. Syria, after all, is situated on the Mediterranean, right across from Europe. The real danger from doing nothing about Assad's chemical attack is that it signals that there are no boundaries in modern war that the Great Powers insist on. Any tolerance of a Syrian chemical strike also lowers the international barriers against the use of biological and nuclear weapons. The writer, a former Israeli UN ambassador, is president of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. 2013-08-30 00:00:00Full Article
Assad's Standing in Syria on the Eve of U.S. Action
(Israel Hayom) Dore Gold - Assad's decision to use chemical weapons last week was because, to a large extent, he is already feeling that his back is against the wall. After all, he used his chemical arsenal against a rebel stronghold not in some remote region but right outside of Damascus, which could have become the springboard for a final offensive against the regime. The fact that Assad and his Iranian allies have not been able to win the war, despite all the outside assistance they have received to date, indicates that Assad's situation must be much worse than it seems on the outside. If Assad is indeed weaker than anyone thought and his chemical attack was more an act of desperation rather than a statement of self-confidence, then U.S. military action could potentially accelerate the end of his regime. While Iran pours Shiite militias into Syria, rival Sunni jihadist forces have built up their military capacity, as well. In the years ahead, Syria could well become a far more dangerous sanctuary for jihadist organizations than Afghanistan ever was. Syria, after all, is situated on the Mediterranean, right across from Europe. The real danger from doing nothing about Assad's chemical attack is that it signals that there are no boundaries in modern war that the Great Powers insist on. Any tolerance of a Syrian chemical strike also lowers the international barriers against the use of biological and nuclear weapons. The writer, a former Israeli UN ambassador, is president of the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. 2013-08-30 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|