Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Institute for Near East Policy) Jeffrey White - The Assad regime is instituting passive defensive measures to protect high-value assets and forces from outside military action. Such measures include dispersing key units, moving headquarters to densely populated civilian areas, and concealing weapons systems. By the time a U.S. strike takes place - if it actually does - the Syrian regime will have had several weeks to prepare its defenses. The regime likely hopes that passive defensive measures can reduce the direct effects of a strike, make the U.S. appear weak and ineffectual, and produce civilian casualties and other collateral damage that could be exploited for propaganda purposes. Although passive defensive measures cannot defeat a U.S. strike, they could reduce its effectiveness and complicate its execution. The writer, a defense fellow at The Washington Institute, is a former senior defense intelligence officer. 2013-09-10 00:00:00Full Article
Syrian Measures to Mitigate the Effects of a U.S. Strike
(Washington Institute for Near East Policy) Jeffrey White - The Assad regime is instituting passive defensive measures to protect high-value assets and forces from outside military action. Such measures include dispersing key units, moving headquarters to densely populated civilian areas, and concealing weapons systems. By the time a U.S. strike takes place - if it actually does - the Syrian regime will have had several weeks to prepare its defenses. The regime likely hopes that passive defensive measures can reduce the direct effects of a strike, make the U.S. appear weak and ineffectual, and produce civilian casualties and other collateral damage that could be exploited for propaganda purposes. Although passive defensive measures cannot defeat a U.S. strike, they could reduce its effectiveness and complicate its execution. The writer, a defense fellow at The Washington Institute, is a former senior defense intelligence officer. 2013-09-10 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|