Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Foreign Policy) Michael Singh - The Obama administration has asserted that the chemical weapons deal with Syria was made possible only due to the credible threat of force. Thus the administration is now committed to the principle that credible threats of force facilitate diplomatic breakthroughs. The inspections regime for Syria will inevitably be seen as a test case for the value of transparency measures in addressing threats of weapons of mass destruction. Syrian misbehavior will not just sour Washington on the Syria deal, but should also make the Obama administration wary of the value of monitoring and verification as substitutes for farther-reaching limits on Iranian nuclear work. The U.S. must maintain and reinforce the pressure that has gotten it this far, lest its tactical gains give way to strategic failure. The writer, former senior director for Middle East affairs at the U.S. National Security Council, is managing director of The Washington Institute for Near East Policy.2013-09-24 00:00:00Full Article
Syria's Lessons for the Iran Nuclear Talks
(Foreign Policy) Michael Singh - The Obama administration has asserted that the chemical weapons deal with Syria was made possible only due to the credible threat of force. Thus the administration is now committed to the principle that credible threats of force facilitate diplomatic breakthroughs. The inspections regime for Syria will inevitably be seen as a test case for the value of transparency measures in addressing threats of weapons of mass destruction. Syrian misbehavior will not just sour Washington on the Syria deal, but should also make the Obama administration wary of the value of monitoring and verification as substitutes for farther-reaching limits on Iranian nuclear work. The U.S. must maintain and reinforce the pressure that has gotten it this far, lest its tactical gains give way to strategic failure. The writer, former senior director for Middle East affairs at the U.S. National Security Council, is managing director of The Washington Institute for Near East Policy.2013-09-24 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|