Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(New York Times) Jodi Rudoren and David E. Sanger - While Washington and Jerusalem have the same stated goal of stopping Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, there is a growing chasm over what might be the acceptable terms for an agreement. Netanyahu's new mantra is "distrust, dismantle and verify," and in an interview with NBC News he insisted on "a full dismantling of Iran's nuclear program." Obama has not recently used the word "dismantle" in his own public comments. Instead he has simply said that Iran must prove its program is peaceful in nature. That decision not to declare publicly that Iran must destroy much of what it has built "really riled the Israelis on their trip," according to one former senior American official who met with some of them. There is also a continuing divergence on how far Iran is today from developing a bomb. Netanyahu has chosen an aggressive interpretation of the evidence, that Iran is a few weeks or months from producing a weapon, while the White House maintains it remains a year or two away.2013-10-04 00:00:00Full Article
U.S. and Israel Share a Goal in Iran Talks, But Not a Strategy
(New York Times) Jodi Rudoren and David E. Sanger - While Washington and Jerusalem have the same stated goal of stopping Iran from developing a nuclear weapon, there is a growing chasm over what might be the acceptable terms for an agreement. Netanyahu's new mantra is "distrust, dismantle and verify," and in an interview with NBC News he insisted on "a full dismantling of Iran's nuclear program." Obama has not recently used the word "dismantle" in his own public comments. Instead he has simply said that Iran must prove its program is peaceful in nature. That decision not to declare publicly that Iran must destroy much of what it has built "really riled the Israelis on their trip," according to one former senior American official who met with some of them. There is also a continuing divergence on how far Iran is today from developing a bomb. Netanyahu has chosen an aggressive interpretation of the evidence, that Iran is a few weeks or months from producing a weapon, while the White House maintains it remains a year or two away.2013-10-04 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|