Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Christian Science Monitor) Daniel DePetris - Recent history suggests that the Assad regime will not live up to any agreements with the UN unless there are repercussions for stonewalling or obstruction. The destruction of Syria's chemical weapons depends upon the full cooperation and transparency of the Assad regime - a government that has flouted every single agreement that it has signed with regional mediators throughout the two-and-a-half-year conflict. During that time, Assad has shown a willingness to violate agreements almost as soon as his regime signs them. Unless the UN Security Council or the U.S. itself is willing to enforce the Kerry-Lavrov deal with accountability and the threat of repercussions if and when Syria drags its heels or fails to fully uphold its obligations, the chances that Assad will act like a responsible statesman are low.2013-10-11 00:00:00Full Article
Why Obama, UN Can't Fully Trust Assad on Chemical Weapons in Syria
(Christian Science Monitor) Daniel DePetris - Recent history suggests that the Assad regime will not live up to any agreements with the UN unless there are repercussions for stonewalling or obstruction. The destruction of Syria's chemical weapons depends upon the full cooperation and transparency of the Assad regime - a government that has flouted every single agreement that it has signed with regional mediators throughout the two-and-a-half-year conflict. During that time, Assad has shown a willingness to violate agreements almost as soon as his regime signs them. Unless the UN Security Council or the U.S. itself is willing to enforce the Kerry-Lavrov deal with accountability and the threat of repercussions if and when Syria drags its heels or fails to fully uphold its obligations, the chances that Assad will act like a responsible statesman are low.2013-10-11 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|