Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Commentary) Michael Rubin - Former U.S. ambassador Ryan Crocker argued in the New York Times on Monday that talking with Iran works, based on his experience in Afghanistan. Yet it is important to consider what Crocker leaves out. While Crocker was holding talks with the Iranians in Kabul, President Bush received intelligence that Iran was creating a secret enrichment facility at Natanz. At the same time, Iran was busy seeking to smuggle in 50 tons of weaponry into Gaza. In effect, Crocker is like the blind man describing the elephant, willing to amplify the description of one aspect of Iranian behavior into wide-ranging conclusions, seemingly unaware that honest description of other parts of the beast suggested the opposite. The writer, a former Pentagon official, is a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. 2013-11-05 00:00:00Full Article
Ryan Crocker, Diplomacy, and the Iranian Elephant
(Commentary) Michael Rubin - Former U.S. ambassador Ryan Crocker argued in the New York Times on Monday that talking with Iran works, based on his experience in Afghanistan. Yet it is important to consider what Crocker leaves out. While Crocker was holding talks with the Iranians in Kabul, President Bush received intelligence that Iran was creating a secret enrichment facility at Natanz. At the same time, Iran was busy seeking to smuggle in 50 tons of weaponry into Gaza. In effect, Crocker is like the blind man describing the elephant, willing to amplify the description of one aspect of Iranian behavior into wide-ranging conclusions, seemingly unaware that honest description of other parts of the beast suggested the opposite. The writer, a former Pentagon official, is a scholar at the American Enterprise Institute. 2013-11-05 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|