Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Ha'aretz) Emily B. Landau - The latest talks in Geneva underscore the impact of biting sanctions on Iran, which cannot get desperately needed sanctions relief without cooperating with the international community. So why is the Obama administration adamantly opposing further pressure on Iran? While Kerry insists that if new sanctions are passed by Congress they would destroy the prospect of getting an agreement, these concerns are an exaggeration. Similar fears were raised before the 2012 sanctions were put in place, but they did not push Iran to exit the NPT; rather, the pressure brought Iran back to the table. Indeed, the most likely result is that further pressure would actually enhance the ability of the P5+1 to get the deal they want. The only chance the P5+1 have to get the nuclear deal they want is by keeping Iran dependent on a negotiated deal for the sanctions relief they desperately need. The P5+1 should not surrender any of the leverage they have worked so hard to gain before getting the results they seek. The writer is a senior research associate at the Institute for National Security Studies at Tel Aviv University. 2013-11-19 00:00:00Full Article
West Shouldn't Undervalue Its Leverage over Iran
(Ha'aretz) Emily B. Landau - The latest talks in Geneva underscore the impact of biting sanctions on Iran, which cannot get desperately needed sanctions relief without cooperating with the international community. So why is the Obama administration adamantly opposing further pressure on Iran? While Kerry insists that if new sanctions are passed by Congress they would destroy the prospect of getting an agreement, these concerns are an exaggeration. Similar fears were raised before the 2012 sanctions were put in place, but they did not push Iran to exit the NPT; rather, the pressure brought Iran back to the table. Indeed, the most likely result is that further pressure would actually enhance the ability of the P5+1 to get the deal they want. The only chance the P5+1 have to get the nuclear deal they want is by keeping Iran dependent on a negotiated deal for the sanctions relief they desperately need. The P5+1 should not surrender any of the leverage they have worked so hard to gain before getting the results they seek. The writer is a senior research associate at the Institute for National Security Studies at Tel Aviv University. 2013-11-19 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|