Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Post) Charles Krauthammer - The only reason Iran has come to the table after a decade of contemptuous stonewalling is that economic sanctions have cut so deeply - Iran's currency has collapsed, inflation is rampant - that the regime fears a threat to its very survival. Regime survival is the only thing the mullahs value above nuclear weapons. And yet precisely at the point of maximum leverage, the West would weaken sanctions in exchange for cosmetic changes that do absolutely nothing to weaken Iran's nuclear infrastructure. If at this point of maximum economic pressure we can't get Iran to accept a final deal that shuts down its nuclear program, how in God's name do we expect to get such a deal when we have radically reduced that pressure? The deal is a rescue package for the mullahs. It widens permissible trade in oil, gold, and auto parts. It releases frozen Iranian assets, increasing Iran's foreign-exchange reserves by 25% while doubling its fully accessible foreign-exchange reserves. The prospective deal is already changing economic expectations. Foreign oil and other interests are reportedly preparing to reopen negotiations for a resumption of trade in anticipation of the full lifting of sanctions. And for what? You'd offer such relief in return for Iran's giving up its pursuit of nuclear weapons. Yet this deal does nothing of the sort. It leaves Iran's nuclear infrastructure intact. Not a single centrifuge is dismantled. In Syria, the first thing the weapons inspectors did was to destroy the machines that make the chemical weapons. Unless you dismantle the centrifuges and prevent the manufacture of new ones, Iran will be perpetually just a few months away from going nuclear. This agreement constitutes the West legitimizing Iran's status as a threshold nuclear state. 2013-11-22 00:00:00Full Article
"Sucker's Deal": A Rescue Package for the Mullahs
(Washington Post) Charles Krauthammer - The only reason Iran has come to the table after a decade of contemptuous stonewalling is that economic sanctions have cut so deeply - Iran's currency has collapsed, inflation is rampant - that the regime fears a threat to its very survival. Regime survival is the only thing the mullahs value above nuclear weapons. And yet precisely at the point of maximum leverage, the West would weaken sanctions in exchange for cosmetic changes that do absolutely nothing to weaken Iran's nuclear infrastructure. If at this point of maximum economic pressure we can't get Iran to accept a final deal that shuts down its nuclear program, how in God's name do we expect to get such a deal when we have radically reduced that pressure? The deal is a rescue package for the mullahs. It widens permissible trade in oil, gold, and auto parts. It releases frozen Iranian assets, increasing Iran's foreign-exchange reserves by 25% while doubling its fully accessible foreign-exchange reserves. The prospective deal is already changing economic expectations. Foreign oil and other interests are reportedly preparing to reopen negotiations for a resumption of trade in anticipation of the full lifting of sanctions. And for what? You'd offer such relief in return for Iran's giving up its pursuit of nuclear weapons. Yet this deal does nothing of the sort. It leaves Iran's nuclear infrastructure intact. Not a single centrifuge is dismantled. In Syria, the first thing the weapons inspectors did was to destroy the machines that make the chemical weapons. Unless you dismantle the centrifuges and prevent the manufacture of new ones, Iran will be perpetually just a few months away from going nuclear. This agreement constitutes the West legitimizing Iran's status as a threshold nuclear state. 2013-11-22 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|