Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Chicago Tribune) Editorial - The U.S. and Iran have cut an interim deal on Tehran's rogue nuclear program. But Iran's nuclear program is churning along while Washington and Tehran have dickered for more than a month about how to implement the deal. The six-month clock to reach a final settlement hasn't started to tick yet. Talk about diplomatic slo-mo. We back the efforts of a bipartisan group of U.S. senators, led by Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) and Robert Menendez (D-NJ), for new, more impactful sanctions on Tehran that would be immediately triggered if negotiations fail. The legislation would dial up the embargo on Iran's oil exports and blacklist its mining, engineering and construction industries. It would cut Iran's access to billions of dollars in overseas bank funds and allow the U.S. to seize foreign-held assets of key regime officials. President Obama has threatened to veto the legislation. The Iranians warn that any move that even appears to impose new sanctions could scuttle the talks. That sounds like a bluff, and it should be called. 2014-01-09 00:00:00Full Article
Back New Sanctions on Iran If Negotiations Fail
(Chicago Tribune) Editorial - The U.S. and Iran have cut an interim deal on Tehran's rogue nuclear program. But Iran's nuclear program is churning along while Washington and Tehran have dickered for more than a month about how to implement the deal. The six-month clock to reach a final settlement hasn't started to tick yet. Talk about diplomatic slo-mo. We back the efforts of a bipartisan group of U.S. senators, led by Mark Kirk (R-Ill.) and Robert Menendez (D-NJ), for new, more impactful sanctions on Tehran that would be immediately triggered if negotiations fail. The legislation would dial up the embargo on Iran's oil exports and blacklist its mining, engineering and construction industries. It would cut Iran's access to billions of dollars in overseas bank funds and allow the U.S. to seize foreign-held assets of key regime officials. President Obama has threatened to veto the legislation. The Iranians warn that any move that even appears to impose new sanctions could scuttle the talks. That sounds like a bluff, and it should be called. 2014-01-09 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|