Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(BBC Monitoring Middle East - Political - 15 Jan 2014) On Jan. 15, the Iranian state-owned TV Channel Two broadcast an interview with the director of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI), Ali Akbar Salehi. Salehi said that research and development was the best part of the Geneva agreement. He said that Iran introduced "a new-generation centrifuge" to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) a few weeks ago; an issue which he said was protested by the P5+1. He said their objection had no foundation and noted that the negotiating team convinced the other side about the subject during expert talks and thanked the negotiating team for their effort. Salehi said that in a six-month period, Iran has "voluntarily" agreed to suspend 20% uranium enrichment. "Suspension of 20% enrichment does not mean that those centrifuges which used to produce 20% would stop working, just that their production line will become 5%." Salehi added that it meant that the production of 5% enriched uranium would go up. On Arak's heavy water reactor, Salehi said that Iran had only agreed not to install "major equipment," such as "the main pumps, control rooms and hot cell." He said that activities in Arak's 40-megawatt reactor were so extensive that no problems would arise for Iran because of that agreement. "Much of this equipment that we have agreed not to install during these six months was not meant to be installed anyway," he said. The interviewer asked Salehi how long it would take for Iran to produce nearly 200 kg. of 20% uranium again, to which Salehi replied, "about one year." Salehi then reiterated that Iran was never in need of 20% enriched uranium, and that the Arak reactor already had enough reserves of fuel for the next four or five years. 2014-01-17 00:00:00Full Article
Iran Atomic Chief Defends Geneva Nuclear Deal in TV Interview
(BBC Monitoring Middle East - Political - 15 Jan 2014) On Jan. 15, the Iranian state-owned TV Channel Two broadcast an interview with the director of the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran (AEOI), Ali Akbar Salehi. Salehi said that research and development was the best part of the Geneva agreement. He said that Iran introduced "a new-generation centrifuge" to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) a few weeks ago; an issue which he said was protested by the P5+1. He said their objection had no foundation and noted that the negotiating team convinced the other side about the subject during expert talks and thanked the negotiating team for their effort. Salehi said that in a six-month period, Iran has "voluntarily" agreed to suspend 20% uranium enrichment. "Suspension of 20% enrichment does not mean that those centrifuges which used to produce 20% would stop working, just that their production line will become 5%." Salehi added that it meant that the production of 5% enriched uranium would go up. On Arak's heavy water reactor, Salehi said that Iran had only agreed not to install "major equipment," such as "the main pumps, control rooms and hot cell." He said that activities in Arak's 40-megawatt reactor were so extensive that no problems would arise for Iran because of that agreement. "Much of this equipment that we have agreed not to install during these six months was not meant to be installed anyway," he said. The interviewer asked Salehi how long it would take for Iran to produce nearly 200 kg. of 20% uranium again, to which Salehi replied, "about one year." Salehi then reiterated that Iran was never in need of 20% enriched uranium, and that the Arak reactor already had enough reserves of fuel for the next four or five years. 2014-01-17 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|