Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(New York Times) Somini Sengupta and Rick Gladstone - Iran's increasingly angry protests over the American decision to not grant a visa to its new UN ambassador have laid bare the limits of global law when its provisions clash with the interests of the U.S., the host country. Experts said Tuesday that even if Iran does have legal grounds to argue that its new ambassador's rights have been violated, there is little it can do. Some suggested the U.S. might even have sympathy and international law on its side. The 1947 UN Headquarters Agreement obliges the host to allow access to foreign diplomatic representatives, even from countries the U.S. dislikes. But the U.S. also enacted a law that year in which it reserved the right to "safeguard its own security" by denying visas to foreign visitors to the UN deemed to be a threat. The ambassador, Hamid Aboutalebi, was a translator for the Iranian revolutionaries in Tehran who seized the American Embassy and took hostages in 1979. In a 1988 case, when the U.S. denied a visa to Yasir Arafat, leader of the Palestine Liberation Organization, the UN meeting was moved from New York to Geneva. 2014-04-16 00:00:00Full Article
Iran Escalates Dispute over UN Envoy
(New York Times) Somini Sengupta and Rick Gladstone - Iran's increasingly angry protests over the American decision to not grant a visa to its new UN ambassador have laid bare the limits of global law when its provisions clash with the interests of the U.S., the host country. Experts said Tuesday that even if Iran does have legal grounds to argue that its new ambassador's rights have been violated, there is little it can do. Some suggested the U.S. might even have sympathy and international law on its side. The 1947 UN Headquarters Agreement obliges the host to allow access to foreign diplomatic representatives, even from countries the U.S. dislikes. But the U.S. also enacted a law that year in which it reserved the right to "safeguard its own security" by denying visas to foreign visitors to the UN deemed to be a threat. The ambassador, Hamid Aboutalebi, was a translator for the Iranian revolutionaries in Tehran who seized the American Embassy and took hostages in 1979. In a 1988 case, when the U.S. denied a visa to Yasir Arafat, leader of the Palestine Liberation Organization, the UN meeting was moved from New York to Geneva. 2014-04-16 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|