Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Institute for National Security Studies-Tel Aviv University) Amos Yadlin and Avner Golov - Iran's strategy in the negotiations is to maximize its nuclear program's achievements and minimize concessions. While attempting to portray itself as prepared to make significant compromises, Tehran is preserving its core capabilities in two areas related to the development of nuclear weapons: uranium enrichment and plutonium production. Iran agreed to reduce its stockpiles of uranium enriched to 20%, which are not sufficient for even one bomb, in order to keep the inventories of material enriched to a low level (3.5%) which are sufficient for at least six bombs if enriched to a military level. Instead of agreeing to convert the reactor in Arak so that it cannot produce plutonium for nuclear weapons, Iran is proposing technical changes that would be reversible if it decided to violate the agreement. Despite six UN Security Council resolutions calling for the immediate suspension of Iran's enrichment process, it appears that the U.S. has already reached a decision to allow Iran to have a nuclear program within certain limitations. The key parameter is the time it will take Iran to develop nuclear weapons. This time must be measured in a number of years and not, as Secretary Kerry suggests, a number of months. Only a long period of time will allow the international community to discover a breakout to nuclear weapons, decide on action, and implement a decision before Iran possesses nuclear weapons. Maj. Gen. (ret.) Amos Yadlin, who served as the IDF's chief of Defense Intelligence, is director of INSS, where Avner Golov is his research assistant. 2014-05-02 00:00:00Full Article
Formulating an Outline for a Final Agreement with Iran
(Institute for National Security Studies-Tel Aviv University) Amos Yadlin and Avner Golov - Iran's strategy in the negotiations is to maximize its nuclear program's achievements and minimize concessions. While attempting to portray itself as prepared to make significant compromises, Tehran is preserving its core capabilities in two areas related to the development of nuclear weapons: uranium enrichment and plutonium production. Iran agreed to reduce its stockpiles of uranium enriched to 20%, which are not sufficient for even one bomb, in order to keep the inventories of material enriched to a low level (3.5%) which are sufficient for at least six bombs if enriched to a military level. Instead of agreeing to convert the reactor in Arak so that it cannot produce plutonium for nuclear weapons, Iran is proposing technical changes that would be reversible if it decided to violate the agreement. Despite six UN Security Council resolutions calling for the immediate suspension of Iran's enrichment process, it appears that the U.S. has already reached a decision to allow Iran to have a nuclear program within certain limitations. The key parameter is the time it will take Iran to develop nuclear weapons. This time must be measured in a number of years and not, as Secretary Kerry suggests, a number of months. Only a long period of time will allow the international community to discover a breakout to nuclear weapons, decide on action, and implement a decision before Iran possesses nuclear weapons. Maj. Gen. (ret.) Amos Yadlin, who served as the IDF's chief of Defense Intelligence, is director of INSS, where Avner Golov is his research assistant. 2014-05-02 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|