Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Wall Street Journal) David Albright and Bruno Tertrais - Despite great expectations that Tehran would clear up suspicions about its past and possibly current nuclear-weapons development, Iran has so far clarified little. Alarm bells should be going off in the West. A prerequisite for any final agreement is for Iran to address nuclear-weapons questions raised by inspectors of the International Atomic Energy Agency. If Iran is able to successfully evade questions about a weapons program now, when biting sanctions are in place, why would it address them later when these sanctions are lifted? What use will an agreement be if Iran can hide a capacity to secretly build nuclear bombs? It is critical to know whether Iran had a nuclear-weapons program in the past, how far the work on warheads advanced and whether it continues. Without clear answers, outsiders will be unable to determine how fast the Iranian regime could construct a nuclear weapon. Mr. Albright, a former UN inspector in Iraq, is the president of the Institute for Science and International Security. Mr. Tertrais is a senior research fellow at the Foundation for Strategic Research in Paris.2014-05-15 00:00:00Full Article
Making Iran Come Clean about Its Nukes
(Wall Street Journal) David Albright and Bruno Tertrais - Despite great expectations that Tehran would clear up suspicions about its past and possibly current nuclear-weapons development, Iran has so far clarified little. Alarm bells should be going off in the West. A prerequisite for any final agreement is for Iran to address nuclear-weapons questions raised by inspectors of the International Atomic Energy Agency. If Iran is able to successfully evade questions about a weapons program now, when biting sanctions are in place, why would it address them later when these sanctions are lifted? What use will an agreement be if Iran can hide a capacity to secretly build nuclear bombs? It is critical to know whether Iran had a nuclear-weapons program in the past, how far the work on warheads advanced and whether it continues. Without clear answers, outsiders will be unable to determine how fast the Iranian regime could construct a nuclear weapon. Mr. Albright, a former UN inspector in Iraq, is the president of the Institute for Science and International Security. Mr. Tertrais is a senior research fellow at the Foundation for Strategic Research in Paris.2014-05-15 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|