Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(National Interest) Mark Dubowitz - Economic sanctions are Washington's preferred instrument of coercive statecraft for confronting challenges to the international order, including from Iran's revolutionary regime. Their psychological impact should never be underestimated. Too rapid a shift from fear to greed in the international business community, and from despair to hope in the Iranian market, can blunt the effectiveness of sanctions. Unfortunately, the sanctions environment for Iran has changed in the past year. Tehran has been on a modest recovery path since the second half of 2013. Western sanctions pressure has de-escalated since the last U.S. congressional sanctions came into effect in mid-2013. The decision to de-escalate the economic pressure reduced the once overwhelming Iranian and international fear of sanctions and buoyed hopes of an Iranian economic recovery. Iran has nearly halved its 40% plus inflation rate, is stabilizing its previously plummeting currency, and is projected for positive growth after losing 6-7% in GDP between 2012 and 2014. Positive shifts in the perceptions of Iran globally - as well as inside the country itself - are fueling a recovery beyond what the interim agreement intended. By changing the sanctions environment, Western negotiators may have inadvertently triggered indirect economic relief to Tehran that is much greater than the U.S. government estimate of $7 billion - and decreased pressure on the regime in the process. The writer is executive director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. 2014-05-23 00:00:00Full Article
Iran: The Psychology of Sanctions
(National Interest) Mark Dubowitz - Economic sanctions are Washington's preferred instrument of coercive statecraft for confronting challenges to the international order, including from Iran's revolutionary regime. Their psychological impact should never be underestimated. Too rapid a shift from fear to greed in the international business community, and from despair to hope in the Iranian market, can blunt the effectiveness of sanctions. Unfortunately, the sanctions environment for Iran has changed in the past year. Tehran has been on a modest recovery path since the second half of 2013. Western sanctions pressure has de-escalated since the last U.S. congressional sanctions came into effect in mid-2013. The decision to de-escalate the economic pressure reduced the once overwhelming Iranian and international fear of sanctions and buoyed hopes of an Iranian economic recovery. Iran has nearly halved its 40% plus inflation rate, is stabilizing its previously plummeting currency, and is projected for positive growth after losing 6-7% in GDP between 2012 and 2014. Positive shifts in the perceptions of Iran globally - as well as inside the country itself - are fueling a recovery beyond what the interim agreement intended. By changing the sanctions environment, Western negotiators may have inadvertently triggered indirect economic relief to Tehran that is much greater than the U.S. government estimate of $7 billion - and decreased pressure on the regime in the process. The writer is executive director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. 2014-05-23 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|