Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(The Hill) Laurie R. Blank - Proportionality is one of a set of fundamental legal obligations that helps to minimize suffering during wartime. The principle of proportionality accepts that not all civilian deaths during war are unlawful, seeking to minimize civilian harm while accepting that such harm cannot be eliminated altogether. Attacks that are likely to cause excessive civilian casualties in light of the military gain from the attack are prohibited - not attacks that are likely to cause any civilian casualties, nor attacks that are likely to cause some civilian casualties, nor attacks that are likely to cause civilian casualties slightly greater than the military gain. An analysis that uses the numbers of casualties and extent of destruction to make legal claims is simply incorrect. Widely different numbers of civilian casualties between two sides in a conflict says nothing about the proportionality of particular attacks on specific targets. The writer is clinical professor of law and director of the International Humanitarian Law Clinic at Emory University School of Law. 2014-07-31 00:00:00Full Article
Number of Civilian Casualties Says Nothing about Proportionality
(The Hill) Laurie R. Blank - Proportionality is one of a set of fundamental legal obligations that helps to minimize suffering during wartime. The principle of proportionality accepts that not all civilian deaths during war are unlawful, seeking to minimize civilian harm while accepting that such harm cannot be eliminated altogether. Attacks that are likely to cause excessive civilian casualties in light of the military gain from the attack are prohibited - not attacks that are likely to cause any civilian casualties, nor attacks that are likely to cause some civilian casualties, nor attacks that are likely to cause civilian casualties slightly greater than the military gain. An analysis that uses the numbers of casualties and extent of destruction to make legal claims is simply incorrect. Widely different numbers of civilian casualties between two sides in a conflict says nothing about the proportionality of particular attacks on specific targets. The writer is clinical professor of law and director of the International Humanitarian Law Clinic at Emory University School of Law. 2014-07-31 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|