Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(MEMRI) Y. Carmon, Y. Yehoshua, and A. Leone - The successive atrocities committed by the Islamic State create the erroneous impression that it is simply a more vicious version of al-Qaeda. Yet based on the organization's official writings and speeches by its leaders, IS places priority not on global terrorism, but rather on establishing and consolidating a state, and hence it defers the clash with the West to a much later stage. Whereas in al-Qaeda, emphasis is on worldwide jihad prior to the declaration of the Islamic caliphate, IS doctrine is characterized by prioritizing the establishment and consolidation of the caliphate state as the overriding objective. It is equally clear that, once the near and immediate enemy has been defeated, the West's turn will arrive. Moreover, if allowed to implement its strategy of stages, upon reaching the stage of war against the West, the Islamic state it is likely to command a wide range of modern military assets, possibly including planes, guided missiles, and chemical weapons. Therefore, postponing the clash with the West serves IS interests rather than the West's.2014-09-17 00:00:00Full Article
Understanding Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi and the Phenomenon of the Islamic Caliphate State
(MEMRI) Y. Carmon, Y. Yehoshua, and A. Leone - The successive atrocities committed by the Islamic State create the erroneous impression that it is simply a more vicious version of al-Qaeda. Yet based on the organization's official writings and speeches by its leaders, IS places priority not on global terrorism, but rather on establishing and consolidating a state, and hence it defers the clash with the West to a much later stage. Whereas in al-Qaeda, emphasis is on worldwide jihad prior to the declaration of the Islamic caliphate, IS doctrine is characterized by prioritizing the establishment and consolidation of the caliphate state as the overriding objective. It is equally clear that, once the near and immediate enemy has been defeated, the West's turn will arrive. Moreover, if allowed to implement its strategy of stages, upon reaching the stage of war against the West, the Islamic state it is likely to command a wide range of modern military assets, possibly including planes, guided missiles, and chemical weapons. Therefore, postponing the clash with the West serves IS interests rather than the West's.2014-09-17 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|