Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Times of Israel) Emily B. Landau - As we move to the Nov. 24 deadline for P5+1-Iran negotiations on a comprehensive nuclear deal, the issue of Iran's past weaponization activities is becoming critical. Iran's most recent stonewalling on the IAEA's outstanding questions regarding the possible military dimensions of Iran's program was evident when Iran missed the Aug. 25 deadline for providing answers. The most important reason for insisting that Iran admit its past work on a military nuclear program is to dispense with Iran's narrative that it has "done no wrong" in the nuclear realm. Even though most officials and experts know that Iran has worked on a military program, the steadfast Iranian denial has effectively undercut the alternative P5+1 narrative, and has considerably weakened the hand of the international negotiators facing Iran. Iran's dogged narrative enables Russia to continue to insist that there is no evidence of military nuclear activity in Iran. Iran's narrative must be discredited, and the charade must end. If Iran was confronted with clear-cut evidence that it had worked on a military nuclear program for years, the case for taking a harsh international approach would gain considerable traction. The only way to get a good nuclear deal with Iran is by exposing the deception and applying massive pressure. The writer is head of the arms control program at the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) at Tel Aviv University. 2014-09-19 00:00:00Full Article
Why We Need Iran to Reveal All
(Times of Israel) Emily B. Landau - As we move to the Nov. 24 deadline for P5+1-Iran negotiations on a comprehensive nuclear deal, the issue of Iran's past weaponization activities is becoming critical. Iran's most recent stonewalling on the IAEA's outstanding questions regarding the possible military dimensions of Iran's program was evident when Iran missed the Aug. 25 deadline for providing answers. The most important reason for insisting that Iran admit its past work on a military nuclear program is to dispense with Iran's narrative that it has "done no wrong" in the nuclear realm. Even though most officials and experts know that Iran has worked on a military program, the steadfast Iranian denial has effectively undercut the alternative P5+1 narrative, and has considerably weakened the hand of the international negotiators facing Iran. Iran's dogged narrative enables Russia to continue to insist that there is no evidence of military nuclear activity in Iran. Iran's narrative must be discredited, and the charade must end. If Iran was confronted with clear-cut evidence that it had worked on a military nuclear program for years, the case for taking a harsh international approach would gain considerable traction. The only way to get a good nuclear deal with Iran is by exposing the deception and applying massive pressure. The writer is head of the arms control program at the Institute for National Security Studies (INSS) at Tel Aviv University. 2014-09-19 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|