Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[New York Post] Editorial - Will the fragile cease-fire in Lebanon hold? Should it hold? No on both counts. To repeat for the record, it was Hizballah - and not Israel - that ignited the current crisis. Former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was correct when he warned Monday that "there will be another round" of fighting. "Right now, we are in an interim period between wars," he added. "And there is no one who will prevent our enemies from preparing for the next round." This is the fourth time the UN Security Council has demanded that Hizballah relinquish control of southern Lebanon and unilaterally disarm. All of the previous demands were simply ignored by Hizballah - without consequence. Indeed, history suggests that only Israel stands to be handcuffed by the UN. More basically, Iran's ambitions are such that the latest cease-fire is doomed - and every honest player in the game knows it. Sooner or later, Israel will have no option other than to finish what it already has started - or, rather, to win the war forced on it by Iran and its terrorist cats-paw, Hizballah. Sooner is better than later. 2006-08-16 01:00:00Full Article
Between Wars
[New York Post] Editorial - Will the fragile cease-fire in Lebanon hold? Should it hold? No on both counts. To repeat for the record, it was Hizballah - and not Israel - that ignited the current crisis. Former Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was correct when he warned Monday that "there will be another round" of fighting. "Right now, we are in an interim period between wars," he added. "And there is no one who will prevent our enemies from preparing for the next round." This is the fourth time the UN Security Council has demanded that Hizballah relinquish control of southern Lebanon and unilaterally disarm. All of the previous demands were simply ignored by Hizballah - without consequence. Indeed, history suggests that only Israel stands to be handcuffed by the UN. More basically, Iran's ambitions are such that the latest cease-fire is doomed - and every honest player in the game knows it. Sooner or later, Israel will have no option other than to finish what it already has started - or, rather, to win the war forced on it by Iran and its terrorist cats-paw, Hizballah. Sooner is better than later. 2006-08-16 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|