Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[Jerusalem Post] Efraim Inbar - The goals of the Annapolis conference were to facilitate the creation of a democratic Palestinian state - free of corruption and militias - that will live peacefully alongside Israel. However, the American initiative rests on several unfounded premises. The first is that Palestinian society can be reformed by outsiders. It is naive to believe that political and social dynamics rooted in centuries-old traditions can be easily manipulated by well-intentioned, but presumptuous Westerners. Change among Palestinian and other Middle Eastern societies can only originate from within. The second fallacy is that economic assistance to the Palestinians can alleviate political problems. Since the Oslo Accords in September 1993, the PA has received the most economic aid per capita in the world. The PA has been ingenious in siphoning a not insignificant amount of the aid it gets to those least in need of outside support. The third fallacy is that Mahmoud Abbas can become the agent for change. The fourth fallacy is that Palestinian society can be quickly transformed into a good neighbor of Israel and that a stable settlement is within reach. Since the Oslo Accords, the PA's education system, media, and dramatic militarization process have done great damage to the collective Palestinian psyche. A society mesmerized by the use of force and embracing the shahid (martyr) ready to explode among the hated Israelis will not change overnight. The writer is director of the Begin-Sadat (BESA) Center for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan University. 2007-11-30 01:00:00Full Article
Palestinian Society Will Not Change Overnight
[Jerusalem Post] Efraim Inbar - The goals of the Annapolis conference were to facilitate the creation of a democratic Palestinian state - free of corruption and militias - that will live peacefully alongside Israel. However, the American initiative rests on several unfounded premises. The first is that Palestinian society can be reformed by outsiders. It is naive to believe that political and social dynamics rooted in centuries-old traditions can be easily manipulated by well-intentioned, but presumptuous Westerners. Change among Palestinian and other Middle Eastern societies can only originate from within. The second fallacy is that economic assistance to the Palestinians can alleviate political problems. Since the Oslo Accords in September 1993, the PA has received the most economic aid per capita in the world. The PA has been ingenious in siphoning a not insignificant amount of the aid it gets to those least in need of outside support. The third fallacy is that Mahmoud Abbas can become the agent for change. The fourth fallacy is that Palestinian society can be quickly transformed into a good neighbor of Israel and that a stable settlement is within reach. Since the Oslo Accords, the PA's education system, media, and dramatic militarization process have done great damage to the collective Palestinian psyche. A society mesmerized by the use of force and embracing the shahid (martyr) ready to explode among the hated Israelis will not change overnight. The writer is director of the Begin-Sadat (BESA) Center for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan University. 2007-11-30 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|