Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
[UPI/Space War] Martin Sieff - Israeli ballistic missile defense planning initially focused on preparing to deal with a possible nuclear threat from Iran. The excellent Israeli-made Arrow - probably the best ABM interceptor in the world for longer ranges and higher altitudes - was designed and upgraded with precisely this kind of threat in mind. A recent series of highly successful tests measured the effectiveness of upgraded versions of the Arrow against target missiles configured to perform like Iranian intermediate-range Shahab-3s. However, the Syrian ballistic missile threat to Israel, while non-nuclear, adds an ominous level of complexity to the threat that defense planners in Tel Aviv must deal with. Where Iranian missiles would be relatively few in number, Syria already has vastly more much smaller and shorter-range missiles, which pose a very different but also very serous threat. Israelis may even face a combination of Iranian and Syrian threats and need to defend themselves simultaneously against intermediate-range ballistic and cruise missiles with potential nuclear warheads from Iran, while at the same time having to deal with hundreds of shorter-range, lower trajectory weapons fired from Syria. 2007-08-31 01:00:00Full Article
Israeli Ballistic Missile Defense Planning
[UPI/Space War] Martin Sieff - Israeli ballistic missile defense planning initially focused on preparing to deal with a possible nuclear threat from Iran. The excellent Israeli-made Arrow - probably the best ABM interceptor in the world for longer ranges and higher altitudes - was designed and upgraded with precisely this kind of threat in mind. A recent series of highly successful tests measured the effectiveness of upgraded versions of the Arrow against target missiles configured to perform like Iranian intermediate-range Shahab-3s. However, the Syrian ballistic missile threat to Israel, while non-nuclear, adds an ominous level of complexity to the threat that defense planners in Tel Aviv must deal with. Where Iranian missiles would be relatively few in number, Syria already has vastly more much smaller and shorter-range missiles, which pose a very different but also very serous threat. Israelis may even face a combination of Iranian and Syrian threats and need to defend themselves simultaneously against intermediate-range ballistic and cruise missiles with potential nuclear warheads from Iran, while at the same time having to deal with hundreds of shorter-range, lower trajectory weapons fired from Syria. 2007-08-31 01:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|