Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(AFP) The U.S. set out what it called its "bottom lines" to reach a deal with Iran to rein in its nuclear program, ahead of new talks next week. A senior U.S. official stressed, "We will only accept an agreement that cuts off the different pathways to the fissile material that Iran needs for a nuclear weapon." While U.S. officials cautioned that there were no guarantees a deal would be reached, they said "the negotiations have advanced substantially, gaps have narrowed." The U.S. official spelled out where Washington was standing firm: Iran should not be allowed to develop weapons-grade plutonium at its Arak reactor. Iran should not use its Fordo nuclear plant to enrich uranium. Any deal must ensure that it would take Iran a year to gather enough fissile material to make a bomb. Iran would "reduce significantly" its current number of operating centrifuges and its domestic stockpile. Iran must agree to unprecedented inspections of both nuclear and production facilities as well as uranium mines and mills, and suspect sites. Relief from international sanctions will be "phased in over a period of time."2015-03-02 00:00:00Full Article
U.S. Sets Out "Bottom Lines" for Iran Nuclear Deal
(AFP) The U.S. set out what it called its "bottom lines" to reach a deal with Iran to rein in its nuclear program, ahead of new talks next week. A senior U.S. official stressed, "We will only accept an agreement that cuts off the different pathways to the fissile material that Iran needs for a nuclear weapon." While U.S. officials cautioned that there were no guarantees a deal would be reached, they said "the negotiations have advanced substantially, gaps have narrowed." The U.S. official spelled out where Washington was standing firm: Iran should not be allowed to develop weapons-grade plutonium at its Arak reactor. Iran should not use its Fordo nuclear plant to enrich uranium. Any deal must ensure that it would take Iran a year to gather enough fissile material to make a bomb. Iran would "reduce significantly" its current number of operating centrifuges and its domestic stockpile. Iran must agree to unprecedented inspections of both nuclear and production facilities as well as uranium mines and mills, and suspect sites. Relief from international sanctions will be "phased in over a period of time."2015-03-02 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|