Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Wall Street Journal) Editorial - The framework of a nuclear deal with Iran has been emerging thanks to Administration leaks to friendly journalists. The leaks suggest the U.S. has already given away so much that any deal on current terms will put Iran on the cusp of nuclear-power status. Kerry says that any deal will have intrusive inspections, but a report last year from the Pentagon's Defense Science Board noted: "At low levels associated with small or nascent [nuclear] programs, key observables are easily masked." This is significant since the Administration insists that any deal will give the U.S. at least one year to detect and stop an Iranian "breakout" effort to build a bomb. Given how bad this deal is shaping up to be, it's not surprising that U.S. allies are speaking out against it. Saudi Arabia has made clear that it might acquire nuclear capabilities in response - precisely the kind of proliferation Obama has vowed to prevent. Many in Congress look at all of this public evidence and understandably fear that the U.S. is walking into a new era of nuclear proliferation with eyes wide shut. 2015-03-02 00:00:00Full Article
Iran on the Nuclear Edge: U.S. Walking into New Era of Nuclear Proliferation with Eyes Wide Shut
(Wall Street Journal) Editorial - The framework of a nuclear deal with Iran has been emerging thanks to Administration leaks to friendly journalists. The leaks suggest the U.S. has already given away so much that any deal on current terms will put Iran on the cusp of nuclear-power status. Kerry says that any deal will have intrusive inspections, but a report last year from the Pentagon's Defense Science Board noted: "At low levels associated with small or nascent [nuclear] programs, key observables are easily masked." This is significant since the Administration insists that any deal will give the U.S. at least one year to detect and stop an Iranian "breakout" effort to build a bomb. Given how bad this deal is shaping up to be, it's not surprising that U.S. allies are speaking out against it. Saudi Arabia has made clear that it might acquire nuclear capabilities in response - precisely the kind of proliferation Obama has vowed to prevent. Many in Congress look at all of this public evidence and understandably fear that the U.S. is walking into a new era of nuclear proliferation with eyes wide shut. 2015-03-02 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|