Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(New York Times) Michael R. Gordon and David E. Sanger - A dispute over what limits should be placed on the development of new types of centrifuges has emerged as a major obstacle as negotiators try to work out an initial accord on Iran's nuclear program, Western officials said on Thursday. The U.S. is worried that allowing the Iranians to perfect more sophisticated centrifuges would make it far easier for Iran to make a dash for a nuclear bomb. Iranians had told the U.S. that the second generation centrifuges they have developed are about three to five times more efficient than the first generation models they are using. Other issues that have not been settled include how many years an agreement would be in effect and what monitoring would be put into place when it expired. France wants the agreement to last for 15 years and then be followed by 10 years of stringent monitoring measures, a Western official said.2015-03-20 00:00:00Full Article
Iran Nuclear Talks Lag, with Status of New Centrifuges Another Hurdle
(New York Times) Michael R. Gordon and David E. Sanger - A dispute over what limits should be placed on the development of new types of centrifuges has emerged as a major obstacle as negotiators try to work out an initial accord on Iran's nuclear program, Western officials said on Thursday. The U.S. is worried that allowing the Iranians to perfect more sophisticated centrifuges would make it far easier for Iran to make a dash for a nuclear bomb. Iranians had told the U.S. that the second generation centrifuges they have developed are about three to five times more efficient than the first generation models they are using. Other issues that have not been settled include how many years an agreement would be in effect and what monitoring would be put into place when it expired. France wants the agreement to last for 15 years and then be followed by 10 years of stringent monitoring measures, a Western official said.2015-03-20 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|