Home
Archives
Jerusalem Center Homepage
View the current issue
Jerusalem Center Videos
Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Wall Street Journal) Editorial - With less than a week to go until the deadline for the Iran nuclear talks, the list of skeptical governments and experts is growing. "Progress has been very limited" on Iran's promise to come clean about its earlier efforts to develop a nuclear weapon, International Atomic Energy Agency head Yukiya Amano said this week. Western intelligence agencies believe the regime tried to develop a nuclear explosive device beginning in the 1980s. Tehran consolidated its weaponization work in the "AMAD Plan," led by Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, a Ph.D. nuclear scientist and senior member of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The AMAD Plan's latest iteration is the Organization of Defensive Innovation and Research. Without a baseline to understand what Iran was doing, it's hard to see how the Obama administration can honor its core pledge to strike a deal that would give the West a one-year warning if Iran decides to build a bomb. Moreover, any verification program that doesn't give inspectors unfettered and immediate access to any place they want to see does little more than create the illusion of inspections while giving Iran the opportunity to cheat.2015-03-27 00:00:00Full Article
Iran Keeps Its Nuclear Secrets
(Wall Street Journal) Editorial - With less than a week to go until the deadline for the Iran nuclear talks, the list of skeptical governments and experts is growing. "Progress has been very limited" on Iran's promise to come clean about its earlier efforts to develop a nuclear weapon, International Atomic Energy Agency head Yukiya Amano said this week. Western intelligence agencies believe the regime tried to develop a nuclear explosive device beginning in the 1980s. Tehran consolidated its weaponization work in the "AMAD Plan," led by Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, a Ph.D. nuclear scientist and senior member of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The AMAD Plan's latest iteration is the Organization of Defensive Innovation and Research. Without a baseline to understand what Iran was doing, it's hard to see how the Obama administration can honor its core pledge to strike a deal that would give the West a one-year warning if Iran decides to build a bomb. Moreover, any verification program that doesn't give inspectors unfettered and immediate access to any place they want to see does little more than create the illusion of inspections while giving Iran the opportunity to cheat.2015-03-27 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
|
Search:
|