Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Pittsburgh Tribune-Review) John Bolton - America's diplomatic efforts to stop Iran have failed; Iran is on track to get nuclear weapons at a time of its own choosing. The only issue remaining is whether a nuclear Iran can be contained and deterred. The monarchs meeting Obama this week at the White House and Camp David are just as worried about Iran becoming a nuclear-weapons state as Israel. Washington might offer sophisticated weapons systems in an effort to reassure the Gulf Arabs, but enhanced conventional firepower is utterly insufficient to contain or deter a determined nuclear power. Even the threat of nuclear retaliation by another nuclear power is hardly likely to deter use of nuclear weapons in the hands of a regime like Iran's. Unfortunately, the Islamic Revolution does not follow the same cost-benefit analysis that Soviet leaders did during the Cold War. For the mullahs, as Bernard Lewis astutely observed, the threat of retaliatory destruction is an incentive, not a deterrent. The writer was U.S. ambassador to the UN and, previously, the undersecretary of state for arms control and international security.2015-05-14 00:00:00Full Article
Can a Nuclear Iran Be Contained?
(Pittsburgh Tribune-Review) John Bolton - America's diplomatic efforts to stop Iran have failed; Iran is on track to get nuclear weapons at a time of its own choosing. The only issue remaining is whether a nuclear Iran can be contained and deterred. The monarchs meeting Obama this week at the White House and Camp David are just as worried about Iran becoming a nuclear-weapons state as Israel. Washington might offer sophisticated weapons systems in an effort to reassure the Gulf Arabs, but enhanced conventional firepower is utterly insufficient to contain or deter a determined nuclear power. Even the threat of nuclear retaliation by another nuclear power is hardly likely to deter use of nuclear weapons in the hands of a regime like Iran's. Unfortunately, the Islamic Revolution does not follow the same cost-benefit analysis that Soviet leaders did during the Cold War. For the mullahs, as Bernard Lewis astutely observed, the threat of retaliatory destruction is an incentive, not a deterrent. The writer was U.S. ambassador to the UN and, previously, the undersecretary of state for arms control and international security.2015-05-14 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|