Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Mosaic) Matti Friedman - Breaking the Silence, usually identified as an organization of Israeli veterans but foreign-funded, has released numerous reports in recent years. Its latest report, based on interviews with "over 60" soldiers, contains no dates or names. Having promised to reveal the secret of the civilian death toll in Gaza in the form of systematic Israeli misdeeds, and having selected, with that purpose in mind, the most incriminating segments from much longer interviews, the report fails to deliver. Perhaps that is why the activist-editors felt compelled to add a heated introduction announcing that their report "exposes" the true face of the Gaza operation. In fact, the interviews themselves show the army taking numerous steps to avoid harm to civilians. The soldiers regularly mention warning leaflets, "roof-knocking" rockets, phone calls, warning shells, warning shots, lists of protected sites like UN facilities, and drones vetting targets for civilians before an airstrike. What is truly striking is that the soldiers simply take all of these steps for granted, as if they were obviously part of warfare, when in fact many are unique to Israeli military practice. Nowhere in the entire report are there massacres or anything similar, or a single incident in which a civilian is shot in circumstances that could not be defended as either warranted or as a legitimate error on a battlefield where even a grandmother could have been (and, in 2006, was) a suicide bomber. I am willing to guess that in many or most cases, these soldiers did not fully understand whom they were talking to, or what they were participating in. Were the Israeli army to adopt what Breaking the Silence appears to recommend - that is, to act with less force and expose soldiers to greater risk - Hamas would have an easier time fighting Israel and more Israelis would die. The writer was a reporter and editor in the Jerusalem bureau of the Associated Press between 2006 and 2011. 2015-05-15 00:00:00Full Article
The Latest "Breaking the Silence" Report Isn't Journalism, It's Propaganda
(Mosaic) Matti Friedman - Breaking the Silence, usually identified as an organization of Israeli veterans but foreign-funded, has released numerous reports in recent years. Its latest report, based on interviews with "over 60" soldiers, contains no dates or names. Having promised to reveal the secret of the civilian death toll in Gaza in the form of systematic Israeli misdeeds, and having selected, with that purpose in mind, the most incriminating segments from much longer interviews, the report fails to deliver. Perhaps that is why the activist-editors felt compelled to add a heated introduction announcing that their report "exposes" the true face of the Gaza operation. In fact, the interviews themselves show the army taking numerous steps to avoid harm to civilians. The soldiers regularly mention warning leaflets, "roof-knocking" rockets, phone calls, warning shells, warning shots, lists of protected sites like UN facilities, and drones vetting targets for civilians before an airstrike. What is truly striking is that the soldiers simply take all of these steps for granted, as if they were obviously part of warfare, when in fact many are unique to Israeli military practice. Nowhere in the entire report are there massacres or anything similar, or a single incident in which a civilian is shot in circumstances that could not be defended as either warranted or as a legitimate error on a battlefield where even a grandmother could have been (and, in 2006, was) a suicide bomber. I am willing to guess that in many or most cases, these soldiers did not fully understand whom they were talking to, or what they were participating in. Were the Israeli army to adopt what Breaking the Silence appears to recommend - that is, to act with less force and expose soldiers to greater risk - Hamas would have an easier time fighting Israel and more Israelis would die. The writer was a reporter and editor in the Jerusalem bureau of the Associated Press between 2006 and 2011. 2015-05-15 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|