Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Wall Street Journal) Hillel Fradkin and Lewis Libby - The Obama administration assures Americans that the Iran deal grants access within 24 days to undeclared but suspected Iranian nuclear sites. A close examination of the agreement reveals that its terms permit Iran to hold inspectors at bay for months, likely three or more. First, the IAEA tells Iran "the basis" of its concerns about a particular location. Iran then provides "explanations," a stage that has no time limit. The suspect site is likely to be remote, and Iran will say that it must gather skilled people and equipment to allay IAEA concerns. Iran may offer explanations in stages, seeking clarifications before "completing" its response. That could take a while. At this point the IAEA must provide written reasons for the request and only then do the supposed 24 days begin to run, but with the possibility of even more opportunities for delay. Mr. Fradkin is director of the Center on Islam, Democracy and the Future of the Muslim World at the Hudson Institute. Mr. Libby, a senior vice president at the Hudson Institute, served in the George W. Bush administration as assistant to the president. 2015-07-22 00:00:00Full Article
Iran Inspections in 24 Days? Not Even Close
(Wall Street Journal) Hillel Fradkin and Lewis Libby - The Obama administration assures Americans that the Iran deal grants access within 24 days to undeclared but suspected Iranian nuclear sites. A close examination of the agreement reveals that its terms permit Iran to hold inspectors at bay for months, likely three or more. First, the IAEA tells Iran "the basis" of its concerns about a particular location. Iran then provides "explanations," a stage that has no time limit. The suspect site is likely to be remote, and Iran will say that it must gather skilled people and equipment to allay IAEA concerns. Iran may offer explanations in stages, seeking clarifications before "completing" its response. That could take a while. At this point the IAEA must provide written reasons for the request and only then do the supposed 24 days begin to run, but with the possibility of even more opportunities for delay. Mr. Fradkin is director of the Center on Islam, Democracy and the Future of the Muslim World at the Hudson Institute. Mr. Libby, a senior vice president at the Hudson Institute, served in the George W. Bush administration as assistant to the president. 2015-07-22 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|