Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Wall Street Journal) Editorial - The nuclear deal specifies that International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors will first have to ask Iran's permission to visit a suspicious location. After that, Iran has the chance to propose "alternative means" to address IAEA suspicions. All of that will take some unspecified period of time. Only then, presumably, does the clock start ticking on the IAEA request. But depending on how Iran interprets such ambiguous clauses as "relevant information" and "alternative means," this process could stretch to a lot longer than 24 days. The Administration is also boasting that the deal establishes a dedicated "procurement channel" through which Iran will be required to purchase all of its nuclear-related material. This is supposed to stop Iran from illicitly shopping for spare nuclear parts - which it has repeatedly been caught doing during the 18 months of negotiations. Yet as sanctions on Iran are lifted and Iranian companies (or their middlemen) gain commercial access to the West, it will become all but impossible to prevent Iran from buying whatever it wants, wherever it wants. 2015-07-23 00:00:00Full Article
The Iranian Inspections Mirage
(Wall Street Journal) Editorial - The nuclear deal specifies that International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors will first have to ask Iran's permission to visit a suspicious location. After that, Iran has the chance to propose "alternative means" to address IAEA suspicions. All of that will take some unspecified period of time. Only then, presumably, does the clock start ticking on the IAEA request. But depending on how Iran interprets such ambiguous clauses as "relevant information" and "alternative means," this process could stretch to a lot longer than 24 days. The Administration is also boasting that the deal establishes a dedicated "procurement channel" through which Iran will be required to purchase all of its nuclear-related material. This is supposed to stop Iran from illicitly shopping for spare nuclear parts - which it has repeatedly been caught doing during the 18 months of negotiations. Yet as sanctions on Iran are lifted and Iranian companies (or their middlemen) gain commercial access to the West, it will become all but impossible to prevent Iran from buying whatever it wants, wherever it wants. 2015-07-23 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|