Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(American Thinker) Salomon Benzimra - On July 20, the UN Security Council rushed to pass UNSC Resolution 2231 unanimously endorsing the nuclear treaty and committed itself to rescind six binding resolutions - passed from 2006 to 2010 under Chapter VII of the UN Charter - originally intended to prevent Iran from enriching uranium and developing ballistic missiles. Iran had systematically scoffed at these resolutions. However, Resolution 2231 is silent on other equally binding Chapter VII resolutions, especially UNSC Resolution 1566 of Oct. 8, 2004, which stresses the obligations of all nations against states or organizations involved in terrorism. Considering that Iran has been the world's number one state sponsor and promoter of terrorist activities for years, it is inconceivable that world powers could turn a blind eye to their international obligations and acquiesce to the ongoing atrocities instigated by Iran. Moreover, the imminent lifting of sanctions and the release of billions of dollars to Iran under the provisions of the treaty fly in the face of the equally binding UNSC Resolution 1373 of Sept. 28, 2001, which calls for "all States...to prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts." 2015-08-18 00:00:00Full Article
The Iran Nuclear Deal's Fallout on the United Nations
(American Thinker) Salomon Benzimra - On July 20, the UN Security Council rushed to pass UNSC Resolution 2231 unanimously endorsing the nuclear treaty and committed itself to rescind six binding resolutions - passed from 2006 to 2010 under Chapter VII of the UN Charter - originally intended to prevent Iran from enriching uranium and developing ballistic missiles. Iran had systematically scoffed at these resolutions. However, Resolution 2231 is silent on other equally binding Chapter VII resolutions, especially UNSC Resolution 1566 of Oct. 8, 2004, which stresses the obligations of all nations against states or organizations involved in terrorism. Considering that Iran has been the world's number one state sponsor and promoter of terrorist activities for years, it is inconceivable that world powers could turn a blind eye to their international obligations and acquiesce to the ongoing atrocities instigated by Iran. Moreover, the imminent lifting of sanctions and the release of billions of dollars to Iran under the provisions of the treaty fly in the face of the equally binding UNSC Resolution 1373 of Sept. 28, 2001, which calls for "all States...to prevent and suppress the financing of terrorist acts." 2015-08-18 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|