Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Wall Street Journal) Editorial - The International Atomic Energy Agency is supposed to provide the "unprecedented verification" that Secretary of State Kerry and President Obama insist is the key to the Iran deal's reliability. So total is the Secretary's faith in the agency that he agreed to let it reach its own side deals with Iran over how to inspect the regime's military sites, without him knowing the particulars of the arrangements. Last week the Associated Press got hold of a near-final draft of one of the side deals, which revealed that the agency would allow Iran to do its own inspections - with its own personnel and equipment - of the military site at Parchin. After the AP released the text of the agreement, defenders of the deal claimed that the issue was no big deal. But knowing what Iran might have done at Parchin is crucial to determining how much time Iran would need to build a bomb. In an April 2014 exchange with PBS News Hour's Judy Woodruff, she asked Kerry: "The International Atomic Energy Agency has said for a long time that it wants Iran to disclose past military-related nuclear activities. Iran is increasingly looking like it's not going to do this. Is the U.S. prepared to accept that?" Kerry responded: "No. They have to do it. It will be done. If there's going to be a deal, it will be done....It will be part of a final agreement. It has to be." 2015-08-26 00:00:00Full Article
Kerry's Leap of Faith on Iran's Self-Inspections
(Wall Street Journal) Editorial - The International Atomic Energy Agency is supposed to provide the "unprecedented verification" that Secretary of State Kerry and President Obama insist is the key to the Iran deal's reliability. So total is the Secretary's faith in the agency that he agreed to let it reach its own side deals with Iran over how to inspect the regime's military sites, without him knowing the particulars of the arrangements. Last week the Associated Press got hold of a near-final draft of one of the side deals, which revealed that the agency would allow Iran to do its own inspections - with its own personnel and equipment - of the military site at Parchin. After the AP released the text of the agreement, defenders of the deal claimed that the issue was no big deal. But knowing what Iran might have done at Parchin is crucial to determining how much time Iran would need to build a bomb. In an April 2014 exchange with PBS News Hour's Judy Woodruff, she asked Kerry: "The International Atomic Energy Agency has said for a long time that it wants Iran to disclose past military-related nuclear activities. Iran is increasingly looking like it's not going to do this. Is the U.S. prepared to accept that?" Kerry responded: "No. They have to do it. It will be done. If there's going to be a deal, it will be done....It will be part of a final agreement. It has to be." 2015-08-26 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|