Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Atlantic) Jeffrey Goldberg - Robert Satloff, the executive director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, argues that there is still time for the administration to make improvements to the Iran nuclear deal to make the agreement stronger - without opening it up for renegotiation - and that, he suggests, is what the Obama administration should be doing. Satloff generated a list of questions he would like to ask President Obama about the deal: ◦You have argued that the Iran deal enhances Israel's security and those of our Arab Gulf allies. At the same time, your administration has offered the Gulf states a huge security package by way of compensation and you have expressed frustration that the government of Israel has not yet entered into discussions with you to discuss ways to bolster its security. But if the Iran deal bolsters their security, shouldn't their security needs be going down, not up? It certainly seems odd for you to claim to understand Israel's security needs more than its democratically elected leaders. Are there other democracies whose leaders you believe don't recognize their own best security interests or is Israel unique in this regard? Former [National Security Council] Iran policy advisor Dennis Ross and others have urged you to transfer to Israel the "mountain-busting" Massive Ordnance Penetrator as a way to boost Israel's independent deterrence against Iran. Instead, in your letter to Congressman [Jerrold] Nadler, you highlighted your plan to send Israel a much less capable weapon. Why are you reluctant to send Israel the best item we have in our inventory to address this profound threat? 2015-08-28 00:00:00Full Article
Questions for President Obama about Iran
(Atlantic) Jeffrey Goldberg - Robert Satloff, the executive director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, argues that there is still time for the administration to make improvements to the Iran nuclear deal to make the agreement stronger - without opening it up for renegotiation - and that, he suggests, is what the Obama administration should be doing. Satloff generated a list of questions he would like to ask President Obama about the deal: ◦You have argued that the Iran deal enhances Israel's security and those of our Arab Gulf allies. At the same time, your administration has offered the Gulf states a huge security package by way of compensation and you have expressed frustration that the government of Israel has not yet entered into discussions with you to discuss ways to bolster its security. But if the Iran deal bolsters their security, shouldn't their security needs be going down, not up? It certainly seems odd for you to claim to understand Israel's security needs more than its democratically elected leaders. Are there other democracies whose leaders you believe don't recognize their own best security interests or is Israel unique in this regard? Former [National Security Council] Iran policy advisor Dennis Ross and others have urged you to transfer to Israel the "mountain-busting" Massive Ordnance Penetrator as a way to boost Israel's independent deterrence against Iran. Instead, in your letter to Congressman [Jerrold] Nadler, you highlighted your plan to send Israel a much less capable weapon. Why are you reluctant to send Israel the best item we have in our inventory to address this profound threat? 2015-08-28 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|