Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Times of Israel) Raphael Ahren - The nuclear deal's mechanism for inspecting Iran's Parchin military complex appears to be unreasonably lax, Olli Heinonen, who served as the International Atomic Energy Agency's deputy director-general, said in an interview. "The key question is: will the IAEA be present during the sample-taking or not?...It looks to me that they might be witnessing the sample-taking through some camera view, or from a distance. If that's really the case, I have a lot of reservations about the reasonability and credibility of the arrangements." Heinonen, who headed the agency's Department of Safeguards, explained: "You need to be present and see physically the place. Therefore, for the IAEA to do a credible job they need to get to that chamber and take independently their samples." Heinonen called on the IAEA to release all its agreements with Iran. "Why not make this public so we can see whether is this a good agreement or not?...I don't see any reason for secrecy here." 2015-09-04 00:00:00Full Article
Heinonen: Parchin Inspection Plan Flawed, IAEA Credibility on the Line
(Times of Israel) Raphael Ahren - The nuclear deal's mechanism for inspecting Iran's Parchin military complex appears to be unreasonably lax, Olli Heinonen, who served as the International Atomic Energy Agency's deputy director-general, said in an interview. "The key question is: will the IAEA be present during the sample-taking or not?...It looks to me that they might be witnessing the sample-taking through some camera view, or from a distance. If that's really the case, I have a lot of reservations about the reasonability and credibility of the arrangements." Heinonen, who headed the agency's Department of Safeguards, explained: "You need to be present and see physically the place. Therefore, for the IAEA to do a credible job they need to get to that chamber and take independently their samples." Heinonen called on the IAEA to release all its agreements with Iran. "Why not make this public so we can see whether is this a good agreement or not?...I don't see any reason for secrecy here." 2015-09-04 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|