Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Wall Street Journal) Joseph I. Lieberman - As someone who has opposed the nuclear agreement with Iran, I acknowledge with regret that the deal will not be stopped by Congress. There are enough votes to adopt a resolution rejecting the agreement, but not enough votes to override the veto President Obama has promised. Yet Minority Leader Harry Reid and others are reportedly planning to filibuster the motion of disapproval and avoid a real vote on what is arguably the most important diplomatic agreement since the end of the Cold War. Supporting a filibuster is a separate question from supporting the agreement. It is unfair and unwise for the administration to use a procedural tactic to stop a vote on an agreement that, according to recent public opinion polls, is opposed by about 60% of the American people. The deal should be brought to a vote. The writer is a former four-term U.S. senator from Connecticut.2015-09-10 00:00:00Full Article
Let Senate Vote on Iran Deal
(Wall Street Journal) Joseph I. Lieberman - As someone who has opposed the nuclear agreement with Iran, I acknowledge with regret that the deal will not be stopped by Congress. There are enough votes to adopt a resolution rejecting the agreement, but not enough votes to override the veto President Obama has promised. Yet Minority Leader Harry Reid and others are reportedly planning to filibuster the motion of disapproval and avoid a real vote on what is arguably the most important diplomatic agreement since the end of the Cold War. Supporting a filibuster is a separate question from supporting the agreement. It is unfair and unwise for the administration to use a procedural tactic to stop a vote on an agreement that, according to recent public opinion polls, is opposed by about 60% of the American people. The deal should be brought to a vote. The writer is a former four-term U.S. senator from Connecticut.2015-09-10 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|