Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Politico) Dennis Ross and David Makovsky - Even many of the supporters of the nuclear deal with Iran have worries about what happens when Iran is no longer limited in the size or the quality of its centrifuges or nuclear infrastructure. Similarly, both supporters and opponents of the deal are understandably concerned about Iran using sanctions relief to provide significantly more material support to Hizbullah and other trouble-makers in the region. Thus, shouldn't it be possible to gain bipartisan agreement on bolstering deterrence and creating a firewall between Iran's threshold nuclear status and its becoming a weapons state, and raising the cost to the Iranians of destabilizing behavior in the region? Putting in legislation language that would support the use of force in response to an Iranian dash toward a nuclear bomb is critically needed if the Iranians are to understand that force and not sanctions will be the response to Iran's violating its commitment not to pursue a nuclear weapon at any point. In addition, we also see a need for legislation to provide the massive ordinance penetrator (MOP) - and the aircraft to carry it - to Israel to reinforce Israeli deterrence. Providing it to Israel would have the added benefit of signaling that we mean what we say about preventing Iran from ever becoming a nuclear weapons state. Finally, legislation that provides for select and targeted sanctions in response to a surge of material support for Iran's proxies in the region is necessary to ensure that Hizbullah, Hamas, and other Iranian-supported militias in the area don't gain as a result of the Iran deal. These practical steps reflect the consensus that exists on preventing Iran from ever acquiring a nuclear weapon or shifting the balance of power in the region against the U.S. and its partners in the area. Amb. Dennis Ross is a long-time U.S. Mideast negotiator. David Makovsky is director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy Project on the Middle East Peace Process. 2015-09-11 00:00:00Full Article
It's Time for Congress to Come Together on Iran
(Politico) Dennis Ross and David Makovsky - Even many of the supporters of the nuclear deal with Iran have worries about what happens when Iran is no longer limited in the size or the quality of its centrifuges or nuclear infrastructure. Similarly, both supporters and opponents of the deal are understandably concerned about Iran using sanctions relief to provide significantly more material support to Hizbullah and other trouble-makers in the region. Thus, shouldn't it be possible to gain bipartisan agreement on bolstering deterrence and creating a firewall between Iran's threshold nuclear status and its becoming a weapons state, and raising the cost to the Iranians of destabilizing behavior in the region? Putting in legislation language that would support the use of force in response to an Iranian dash toward a nuclear bomb is critically needed if the Iranians are to understand that force and not sanctions will be the response to Iran's violating its commitment not to pursue a nuclear weapon at any point. In addition, we also see a need for legislation to provide the massive ordinance penetrator (MOP) - and the aircraft to carry it - to Israel to reinforce Israeli deterrence. Providing it to Israel would have the added benefit of signaling that we mean what we say about preventing Iran from ever becoming a nuclear weapons state. Finally, legislation that provides for select and targeted sanctions in response to a surge of material support for Iran's proxies in the region is necessary to ensure that Hizbullah, Hamas, and other Iranian-supported militias in the area don't gain as a result of the Iran deal. These practical steps reflect the consensus that exists on preventing Iran from ever acquiring a nuclear weapon or shifting the balance of power in the region against the U.S. and its partners in the area. Amb. Dennis Ross is a long-time U.S. Mideast negotiator. David Makovsky is director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy Project on the Middle East Peace Process. 2015-09-11 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|