Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Ha'aretz) Shlomo Avineri - Most Israelis view the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as a struggle between two national movements: the Jewish national movement - Zionism - and the Palestinian national movement. The internal logic of such a view leads to what is called the two-state solution. According to the Palestinians' view, however, this is not a conflict between two national movements but between one national movement (the Palestinian) and a colonial and imperialistic entity (Israel). According to the Palestinian view, the Jews are not a nation but a religious community, and as such not entitled to national self-determination. According to this view, the Palestinians see all of Israel - and not just the West Bank and Gaza - as analogous to Algeria: an Arab country out of which the foreign colonialists were ultimately expelled. This is also the reason for the Palestinians' refusal to accept Israel as the Jewish nation-state. At the end of the day, the Palestinian position views Israel as an illegitimate entity, sooner or later doomed to disappear. This is not just a matter of historical narrative: It has political implications for the here and now. If Israel is not a legitimate state, there is no ground for an end-of-conflict agreement based on compromise. The writer, professor of political science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, served as director-general of Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2015-10-02 00:00:00Full Article
Israelis and Palestinians: A Fundamental Difference in Outlook
(Ha'aretz) Shlomo Avineri - Most Israelis view the Israeli-Palestinian conflict as a struggle between two national movements: the Jewish national movement - Zionism - and the Palestinian national movement. The internal logic of such a view leads to what is called the two-state solution. According to the Palestinians' view, however, this is not a conflict between two national movements but between one national movement (the Palestinian) and a colonial and imperialistic entity (Israel). According to the Palestinian view, the Jews are not a nation but a religious community, and as such not entitled to national self-determination. According to this view, the Palestinians see all of Israel - and not just the West Bank and Gaza - as analogous to Algeria: an Arab country out of which the foreign colonialists were ultimately expelled. This is also the reason for the Palestinians' refusal to accept Israel as the Jewish nation-state. At the end of the day, the Palestinian position views Israel as an illegitimate entity, sooner or later doomed to disappear. This is not just a matter of historical narrative: It has political implications for the here and now. If Israel is not a legitimate state, there is no ground for an end-of-conflict agreement based on compromise. The writer, professor of political science at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, served as director-general of Israel's Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2015-10-02 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|