Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Times of Israel) Gerald M. Steinberg - The EU Ambassador to Israel, Lars Faaborg-Andersen, asked why labeling Israeli goods from beyond the Green Line is such a big problem. The marking of products from beyond the 1949 armistice lines goes far beyond another awkward EU attempt to impose its ideas on Israeli democracy. Product labeling is the embodiment of a strategy to delegitimize Israel and the right of the Jewish people to sovereign equality. It is central to the political war embodied in the BDS - boycott, divestment and sanctions - campaign, whose stated objective is not peace, but rather "the complete international isolation of Israel." This campaign is conducted through false-flag human rights and humanitarian groups, many of which are funded generously by the EU and its member states. In other words, while invoking the rhetoric of peace, the EU and its spokesperson in Israel continue to promote policies and organizations that reinforce the conflict. Product labeling, which promotes boycotts and other actions that single-out and demonize Israel, is the facade for this process. In the midst of another wave of brutal terror, this is certainly not the time for European political posturing. At the same time, a full and independent investigation of the EU's relationships with fringe groups that fuel the conflict is long overdue. The writer is professor of political science at Bar-Ilan University and president of NGO Monitor. 2015-10-28 00:00:00Full Article
Why Is EU Product Labeling a Big Deal?
(Times of Israel) Gerald M. Steinberg - The EU Ambassador to Israel, Lars Faaborg-Andersen, asked why labeling Israeli goods from beyond the Green Line is such a big problem. The marking of products from beyond the 1949 armistice lines goes far beyond another awkward EU attempt to impose its ideas on Israeli democracy. Product labeling is the embodiment of a strategy to delegitimize Israel and the right of the Jewish people to sovereign equality. It is central to the political war embodied in the BDS - boycott, divestment and sanctions - campaign, whose stated objective is not peace, but rather "the complete international isolation of Israel." This campaign is conducted through false-flag human rights and humanitarian groups, many of which are funded generously by the EU and its member states. In other words, while invoking the rhetoric of peace, the EU and its spokesperson in Israel continue to promote policies and organizations that reinforce the conflict. Product labeling, which promotes boycotts and other actions that single-out and demonize Israel, is the facade for this process. In the midst of another wave of brutal terror, this is certainly not the time for European political posturing. At the same time, a full and independent investigation of the EU's relationships with fringe groups that fuel the conflict is long overdue. The writer is professor of political science at Bar-Ilan University and president of NGO Monitor. 2015-10-28 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|