Additional Resources
Top Commentators:
- Elliott Abrams
- Fouad Ajami
- Shlomo Avineri
- Benny Avni
- Alan Dershowitz
- Jackson Diehl
- Dore Gold
- Daniel Gordis
- Tom Gross
- Jonathan Halevy
- David Ignatius
- Pinchas Inbari
- Jeff Jacoby
- Efraim Karsh
- Mordechai Kedar
- Charles Krauthammer
- Emily Landau
- David Makovsky
- Aaron David Miller
- Benny Morris
- Jacques Neriah
- Marty Peretz
- Melanie Phillips
- Daniel Pipes
- Harold Rhode
- Gary Rosenblatt
- Jennifer Rubin
- David Schenkar
- Shimon Shapira
- Jonathan Spyer
- Gerald Steinberg
- Bret Stephens
- Amir Taheri
- Josh Teitelbaum
- Khaled Abu Toameh
- Jonathan Tobin
- Michael Totten
- Michael Young
- Mort Zuckerman
Think Tanks:
- American Enterprise Institute
- Brookings Institution
- Center for Security Policy
- Council on Foreign Relations
- Heritage Foundation
- Hudson Institute
- Institute for Contemporary Affairs
- Institute for Counter-Terrorism
- Institute for Global Jewish Affairs
- Institute for National Security Studies
- Institute for Science and Intl. Security
- Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center
- Investigative Project
- Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs
- RAND Corporation
- Saban Center for Middle East Policy
- Shalem Center
- Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Media:
- CAMERA
- Daily Alert
- Jewish Political Studies Review
- MEMRI
- NGO Monitor
- Palestinian Media Watch
- The Israel Project
- YouTube
Government:
Back
(Washington Post) Editorial - The voting in Iran showed, like most Iranian elections, that a large part of the public supports a liberalization of the regime. But as in the past, that popular sentiment is unlikely to bring about substantial change in the near future - in part because many of those elected are far less reform-minded than those who voted for them. Claims of a reformist triumph are overblown. Most of those in Rouhani's coalition are, like him, moderate conservatives, meaning they favor economic reforms and greater Western investment, but not liberalization of the political system or a moderation of Iran's aspiration to become the hegemon of the Middle East. Iran can be expected to continue the course it has been pursuing in the months since the nuclear deal was struck: waging proxy wars against the U.S. and its allies around the Middle East, using its unfrozen reserves to buy weapons, and defying non-nuclear limits - such as by testing long-range missiles. The elections won't make the regime more pliable, and they won't change the need for a U.S. counter to its aggressions.2016-03-04 00:00:00Full Article
Iran's Elections Won't Change the Need for a U.S. Counter to Its Aggressions
(Washington Post) Editorial - The voting in Iran showed, like most Iranian elections, that a large part of the public supports a liberalization of the regime. But as in the past, that popular sentiment is unlikely to bring about substantial change in the near future - in part because many of those elected are far less reform-minded than those who voted for them. Claims of a reformist triumph are overblown. Most of those in Rouhani's coalition are, like him, moderate conservatives, meaning they favor economic reforms and greater Western investment, but not liberalization of the political system or a moderation of Iran's aspiration to become the hegemon of the Middle East. Iran can be expected to continue the course it has been pursuing in the months since the nuclear deal was struck: waging proxy wars against the U.S. and its allies around the Middle East, using its unfrozen reserves to buy weapons, and defying non-nuclear limits - such as by testing long-range missiles. The elections won't make the regime more pliable, and they won't change the need for a U.S. counter to its aggressions.2016-03-04 00:00:00Full Article
Search Daily Alert
Search:
|